DocketNumber: No. CV 92 030 04 32
Citation Numbers: 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5223
Judges: RUSH, J.
Filed Date: 4/30/1998
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The defendant asserts that the initial decision of this court was an error and claims that the damages should be awarded on a basis contrary to the decision of this court.
The court has reviewed the plaintiff's claims and adheres to its prior decision. The plaintiff also stated in oral argument if there were a right to rescind the contract, the CT Page 5224 award of the ATR appropriately measures damages.
The defendant asserts that there was no evidence received by the ATR that would justify the award made by the ATR. However, in oral argument counsel for the defendant stated that if the contract were in effect until it was rescinded on April 23, 1992 the defendant was willing to live with the award of damages made by the ATR.
Under such state of circumstances the court overrules the objections to the report of the ATR; and that report is excepted and judgment may enter in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $17,951.99.
By the Court,
RUSH, JUDGE