DocketNumber: No. CV 99 042 4248S
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 9573
Judges: ZOARSKI, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 7/30/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The plaintiff states it opposes the Motion to Strike as to the Third and Fourth Counts of the complaint because a valid assignment existed which required the defendant to include the plaintiff as a payee on checks issued on the insurance claim. CT Page 9574
A review of the exhibit attached to the complaint is an employment contract for different property, and it does not relate to the fire loss alleged in the complaint. In the absence of a valid assignment the defendant did not owe any duty to the plaintiff as claimed by the plaintiff.
Therefore the Motion to Strike Counts Three and Four is granted.
Howard F. Zoarski, Judge Trial Referee