DocketNumber: No. CV97 034 93 52
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13255, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 421
Judges: MOTTOLESE, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 9/21/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
To this end the court ordered the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum of law addressing this issue. The court is unpersuaded that either §
A review of the case law indicates that the power of the court to make adjustments in the respective amounts to be distributed to the co-owners in accordance with equitable principles derives from the conduct of the parties during the period of their co-ownership not from events which have transpired because of the litigation. The remedy of reduction of the defendant's share by the amount of the attorney's fees "falls outside the realm of partition . . . by sale and is [are] not legally permissible."Fernandes v. Rodriguez,
For example, our Supreme Court has denied the trial court the power (i) to convert a shopping center to condominium form of ownership, Wilcox v.Willard Shopping Center, Association,
In conclusion the plaintiff must resort to conventional means to collect the attorney's fees.
MOTTOLESE, J.