DocketNumber: No. BIK-CV93-0304876
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1287, 13 Conn. L. Rptr. 442
Judges: VERTEFEUILLE, J.
Filed Date: 2/9/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
General Statutes §
Generally, the burden of proof is on the defendant with respect to jurisdictional issues raised by the defendant; this is because of the presumption of the truth of the facts stated in the officer's return. Standard Tallow Corporation v. Jowdy,
In this case there is a presumption of abode service based on the sheriff's return. Dr. Francescon apparently does not dispute that 50 Pine Brook Court, Cheshire is his principal place of abode. His claim, therefore, is simply a denial of service. Under such circumstances, the presumption in favor of service must be sustained. A denial of service by the defendant which is not corroborated by any other evidence, details or circumstances is insufficient to overcome the prima facie evidence of the sheriff's return. Uyen Phan v. Delgado,