DocketNumber: No. FA00-0630369 S
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 17270, 31 Conn. L. Rptr. 152
Judges: BRENNAN, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Filed Date: 12/20/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The law on aggrievement is succinctly set forth in Milford v. Lodge 1566,
"The test for determining aggrievement encompasses a well settled twofold determination: first, the party claiming aggrievement must demonstrate a specific and legal interest in the subject matter of the decision, as distinguished from a general interest shared by the community as a whole; second, the party claiming aggrievement must establish that this specific personal and legal interest has been CT Page 17271 specially and injuriously affected by the decision. Mere status as a party or a participant in the proceedings below does not in and of itself constitute aggrievement for the purposes of appellate review."
This court is unable to perceive how the plaintiff's interest in this paternity and support petition has in any fashion been adversely affected by the magistrate's ruling. On the contrary it would appear that plaintiff's likelihood of recovering support for the minor child has been increased twofold by that decision. That the plaintiff State of Connecticut may now look to the mother of the minor child as well as its father for reimbursement of a support arrearage constitutes good fortune rather than aggrievement. Defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal is accordingly granted.
By the Court,
John D. Brennan Judge Trial Referee