DocketNumber: No. CV99-3051
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11020
Judges: GRAZIANI, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 8/27/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The petitioner in this matter filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus on August 9, 1999, said petition claiming 533 days of jail credit. An amended petition was filed on September 28, 2000, by the special public defender appointed to represent the petitioner. The amended petition also sought the relief of crediting the petitioner with 533 days of jail credit, though the amended petition did state as a basis for the claim the allegation that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request that bond be posted on both the underlying convictions, so that the petitioner would have earned pre-sentence jail credit on both underlying charges instead of only one. Am. Pet., at
The parties have stipulated to the following:
1. The petitioner was released from the Department of Correction on May 4, 2001 and is no longer in custody.
2. The case is a confinement credit case.
3. Both parties stipulate that the habeas corpus is moot.
The petitioner in this matter sought 533 days of jail credit. The petitioner discharged May 4, 2001, from the sentences at issue in the habeas corpus petition. "General Statutes §
The Supreme Court in Payton "rejected [the petitioner's] claim, concluding that neither the language nor the legislative history of §
Based upon the foregoing, this Court finds, in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, that the petitioner's jail credit claim was rendered moot by the petitioner's discharge from the sentences underlying the jail credit claim. The relief sought by the petitioner is not available, and there is no relief the habeas court can grant, upon the petitioner's discharge from the sentences underlying the jail credit claim. The motion to dismiss the petition is granted in accordance with the stipulation of the parties and Practice Book §
GRAZIANI, J. CT Page 11022