DocketNumber: No. CV02-0462732
Citation Numbers: 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1649, 33 Conn. L. Rptr. 698
Judges: GILARDI, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 1/30/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The only question remaining is whether or not a Request to Revise, filed by the defendant on October 16, 2002, precluded this court's consideration of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss which was filed on June 5, 2002. The Plaintiff is claiming that the sequence of pleadings pursuant to §
It should be noted that Practice Book §
There is nothing in the file to indicate the reason why the matter did not appear for four months; at which time the defendant filed the Request to Revise.
Section
It is the ruling of this court that the Motion to Dismiss by the Defendant was timely filed and that the request to revise was filed subsequent to the motion to dismiss and therefore does not preclude its CT Page 1650 efficacy.
Based on the agreement of all parties that a claim for Defamation may not be pursued pursuant to C.G.S. §
Richard P. Gilardi, Judge CT Page 1651