DocketNumber: No. CV95 032 16 68 S
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2676
Judges: WEST, J.
Filed Date: 3/20/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
On December 29, 1995, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendant filed a memorandum in opposition thereto on January 16, 1996.
"Practice Book § 384 provides that summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Barrett v.Danbury Hospital,
The plaintiff contends that it has registered a foreign judgment, that it has filed a judgment lien on the defendant's property to satisfy the same, that the defendant has not paid the judgment, and has no defenses to it. The plaintiff has submitted in support of its motion for summary judgment a copy of the New York judgment, and an affidavit of Keith Lane, a credit manager employed by the plaintiff, who attests that judgment has entered against the defendant in New York and that the defendant has paid no part of the judgment. The defendant argues that there are several lawsuits in progress between the parties and that the CT Page 2678 court should not grant summary judgment on the foreclosure action for equitable reasons. The defendant attests as to the plaintiff's actions in various other lawsuits and further attests that the plaintiff's actions are unconscionable and undertaken solely to harass the defendant.
"[A] judgment lien on real property may be foreclosed or redeemed in the same manner as mortgages on the same property . . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) FairfieldPlumbing and Heating Supply Corp. v. Kosa,
The defendant's evidence does not challenge the validity of the judgment lien, but relies upon equitable considerations which have been raised as special defenses in other actions pending between the parties. Inasmuch as these equitable considerations have been raised in other actions, they are better determined within the context of those actions. The defendant also argues that there is insufficient equity in his home to satisfy the judgment lien; however, this is no bar to proceeding with the pending foreclosure.
Clearly, the plaintiff has provided evidence of the foreign judgment, and the defendant admits the existence of the judgment lien. The defendant has not provided any evidence attacking either the foreign judgment or the lien. Accordingly, the court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to liability, and that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted.
WEST, J.