DocketNumber: No. FA99-90766
Citation Numbers: 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10776
Judges: DiPENTIMA, JUDGE. CT Page 10777
Filed Date: 9/1/2000
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
This court has jurisdiction over the parties and the marriage.
Based upon the relevant, credible and admissible evidence presented to the court, the following constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law taking into account the statutory scheme set forth that govern orders entered in these types of family cases.
The plaintiff-wife has worked during the course of this marriage from and after the time of the birth of their second child. Her earnings were placed in a joint account and were used to pay bills along with the earnings of the defendant-husband. The marriage defendant proposes to appeal. Despite the fact that the court read into the record the provisions of this rule at the start of the hearing, the defendant presented no testimony as to the grounds of this appeal.
While great latitude is allowed to a litigant appearing pro se so far as the just rights of the other party are protected, the pro se is "bound by the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law." Cersosimo v. Cersosimo,
Before granting an application under P.B. §
A frivolous appeal, the court ruled, is one where the applicant's likelihood of success is slight. Id. To determine whether the plaintiffs proposed appeal is frivolous, the court should examine the trial court ruling and the issues which the applicant intends to raise on appeal.
Id. See also Ferrucci v. Davidson, 22 Conn. Law Tribune No. 19, p. 39 (5/12/86).
The court here has reviewed its ruling, and assuming the defendant will raise the same issues on appeal, the court finds the likelihood of CT Page 10778 success slight.
Because the defendant has failed to comply with the rule to set forth verified grounds for his appeal and because the court cannot find that the defendant is entitled to an appeal, the application for waiver of fees is denied.
DiPentima, J.