DocketNumber: No. FA 88 85255
Citation Numbers: 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 450-Z
Judges: SHORTALL, J.
Filed Date: 1/23/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Having reviewed the file, the court concludes from the post-judgment history of the matter that the plaintiff has a reasonable security interest in the defendant's share in the sale proceeds. See Livsey v. Livsey, Superior Court, Judicial Districtof Stamford/Norwalk, Docket No. FA79-172921 (July 30, 1985). The interest of a party who is owed alimony and child support in the proceeds of a post-judgment sale of property has recently been recognized in Kucej v. Statewide Grievance Committee,
The court also notes that, in a motion for modification filed by the defendant on July 23, 1996, he represented to the court that "from the Defendant's distribution(of the sale proceeds) all of arrearages are expected to be paid".
Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss is denied. The plaintiff and defendant may reclaim any pending motions still requiring the court's attention so that all may be addressed at the same time.
BY THE COURT
SHORTALL, J.