DocketNumber: No. CV91 28 21 94
Judges: THIM, JUDGE
Filed Date: 6/12/1991
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The key issues relate to timeliness of the filing of the lien and the amount of the lien. The respondent is a sub-contractor who performed services and provided materials for a construction project on the applicant's property. In December of 1990, the sub-contractor met with the owner and architect. The owner requested the sub-contractor to return to the job site and complete work which was required under the contract but had not been completed by the sub-contractor. On December 11 and 12, 1990, the sub-contractor's employees worked on the site. Their work was in accordance with the original contract. It was not trivial work. It was not work performed by the sub-contractor as a subterfuge for reviving a lien. The statutory period for filing the lien commenced in December. Accordingly, the lien was timely filed.
The value of the unpaid services is $32,000. The respondent agreed, however, not to file a lien for an amount greater than $23,000. Hence, the lien must be reduced to $23,000.
Artisans, Inc. has established probable cause to sustain the validity of its lien. The lien is reduced to $23,000.
THIM, JUDGE CT Page 5182