DocketNumber: No. FA 99 0171888S
Citation Numbers: 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 10061
Judges: HARRIGAN, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 7/20/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The defendant husband in this case has initiated an action for divorce in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, New York seeking to dissolve the marriage. He alleges in the summons that he is a resident of Greenwich, Connecticut.
Our statute allows a dissolution of marriage action to be maintained if one of the parties is a Connecticut resident at the time it is started, §
The defendant's motion to dismiss assumes the initiation of the New York action is sufficient to capture what the defendant characterizes as the "marital res". This major premise, if granted, makes the defendant's theory logical.
There is nothing in the record to explain why New York would exercise jurisdiction in these circumstances. If a New York CT Page 10062 resident brought suit against the spouse who also resided in New York in our court, would Connecticut have captured the "marital res"? This court thinks not.
The "res incorporales" location is not yet "res adjudicata" but remains "res controversa" since this court declines to adopt the defendant's premise.
The defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.
HARRIGAN, J.