DocketNumber: No. CV 94 036 78 38
Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7236
Judges: MALONEY, J.
Filed Date: 6/8/1995
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The court's decision in this case is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Matarazzo v. Rowe,
In the present case, the hearing officer denied the application for benefits on the basis that the spend down rule was not applicable. Accordingly, there was no finding of fact as to the amount of incurred expenses during the months in question. In order to determine whether the rule of Matarazzo v. Rowe applies to the plaintiff's case and to what extent, it is necessary that the case be remanded for further factual findings.
The plaintiff's appeal is sustained and the case is remanded to the department of social services for further proceedings consistent with this decision and the decision of the court in Matarazzo v. Rowe, supra.
MALONEY, J. CT Page 7237