DocketNumber: File 109945
Citation Numbers: 139 A.2d 68, 20 Conn. Super. Ct. 443, 20 Conn. Supp. 443, 1958 Conn. Super. LEXIS 14
Judges: Alcorn
Filed Date: 1/21/1958
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024
The complaint, supplemented by the more specific statement, sets forth, in substance, that the parties, on a Sunday, entered into a written agreement for a sale of real estate, the agreement on its face being dated as of the next day and reciting the payment and receipt of $100 to apply on the purchase price; that about two days later the defendants accepted $100 as a deposit on the transaction; and again a few days later an additional deposit of $600; but thereafter the defendants refused to perform the agreement although the plaintiff was ready, willing and tendered performance. These allegations must be taken as admitted for purposes of the demurrer, which is upon the ground that the contract is illegal and unenforceable because made on Sunday.
The facts concerning the payment and receipt of a consideration distinguish the case from Nygren v.Potocek,
The demurrer is overruled.