DocketNumber: No. CV00 059 93 11
Citation Numbers: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4508
Judges: MALONEY, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 3/28/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Based on evidence presented at the hearing on this appeal, including stipulations of the parties, the court finds that the plaintiffs own property contiguous to the property which is the subject of the appeal and are, therefore, statutorily aggrieved by the commission's decision.
A significant factor in the commission's decision was the prior approval of a wetlands permit issued in connection with the same project by the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Water Courses Commission. This court has, on this date, sustained the appeal of these plaintiffs of that commission's decision. The consequent invalidity of the wetlands permit CT Page 4509 constitutes a material change in the facts and circumstances on which the commission's decision was based.
Ordinarily, a commission "cannot reverse its previous decision unless the facts and circumstances that actuated the decision are shown to have so changed as to vitiate or materially to affect the reason that produced and supported the decision." Sharp v. ZBA,
The appeal is sustained, and the case is remanded to the commission for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
Maloney, J.