DocketNumber: No. 85923
Citation Numbers: 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2822
Judges: DiPENTIMA, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 4/12/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
The lease provision reads
Any differences between the parties as to their several rights or obligations under this lease which are not settled by mutual agreement shall be submitted to three (3) arbitrators familiar CT Page 2823 with farming operations, one to be selected by Lessor, one by Lessees and the third selected by the two so selected. The arbitrator' s decision shall be accepted by both parties.
The plaintiff objects to the motion on several grounds: 1) the lease has expired so that the arbitration provision does not apply, 2) the defendants have not asserted that they are ready and willing to proceed with arbitration, and 3) the defendants have waited too long to receive the benefit of this provision.
C.G.S. §
The court finds that there are issues in this action that are referable to arbitration under the terms of the lease. The phrase "as to their several rights and obligations" under the lease encompasses the issues raised in the two counts of the complaint. Further, as to the plaintiff's first argument, the court finds that the notice to quit does not invalidate the arbitration provision by terminating the lease.
Notwithstanding the above findings, for the following reasons the court does not stay this action pending arbitration. The Notice to Quit was served on February 23, 1996, this action initiated on March 13, 1996, and the defendants' Answer was filed without special defenses on March 25, 1996. By this Motion filed on April 8, 1996, the defendants first raise the issue of the arbitration provision. Neither in the Motion nor at the hearing did the defendants indicate they were ready and willing to proceed to arbitration. "As a condition precedent to the issuance of a stay order [under §
Alex Davis DiPentima, Judge