DocketNumber: No. FA89 02 73 64S
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 4130
Judges: MANCINI, STATE TRIAL REFEREE
Filed Date: 5/5/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The plaintiff claims a substantial change in circumstances of the parties warranting an increase in the alimony payments to the plaintiff wife. Judge Fuller granted the alimony order after taking full notice of all the circumstances at that time.
The court finds, based upon normal inflationary levels, the defendant has not any appreciable amount of income. The fact that the plaintiff's conditions have changed is not the fault of the defendant and her increase in her style of living should not be calculated in any increase of alimony. However, the increase in her medical insurance amounts to approximately $6.00 per week. The court has searched the record for any substantial change in circumstances. The court cannot find any increase of great importance.
The original order by Judge Fuller in examination of the Judgment File it appears that all future financial burdens were examined thoroughly. The original order was not appealed. At the present time the plaintiff is unemployed. At the time of the divorce the plaintiff was unemployed. At the original divorce hearing, the court in its judgment ordered the dwelling of the parties to be sold or defendant could purchase the plaintiff's share. The defendant did exercise that right and paid the plaintiff approximately $70,000. Further, $11,226 was paid to the plaintiff from the defendant's IRA.
Plaintiff claims she has a shortfall of "almost $200" per month. Based upon increase of medical liability and inflationary costs and the increase of the defendant's income, the court awards the plaintiff an additional $15 per week. The judgment remains nonmodifiable as to term. The court finds that the amount awarded by this court is nonmodifiable.
PHILIP E. MANCINI, JR. STATE TRIAL REFEREE