DocketNumber: No. 075750
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 5008
Judges: MEADOW, J.
Filed Date: 6/1/1992
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The defendant, Texaco, however, does not suggest the document be admitted as a full exhibit (See Reply of Texaco, Inc., dated May 14, 1991, pp. 4-6).
At the time of trial, the court did not refuse to mark the phone log an exhibit for identification, nor was an exception taken. (See transcript attached to Texaco Reply, dated May 14, 1992. Since the defendant, Texaco, has offered to mark the log as an identification exhibit reserving to it all other objections made by it as set forth in its Reply Brief, dated May 14, 1992, the court hereby marks said phone log for identification only as a court exhibit for purposes of review. CT Page 5009
Plaintiff Pie Plate Inc.'s Motion to Set Aside Verdict is hereby denied.
MEADOW, JUDGE