DocketNumber: No. CV97 034 11 01 S
Citation Numbers: 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2578-cw
Judges: THIM, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 2/20/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
The defendant claims that the fact finder improperly reached his conclusions because the plaintiff failed to satisfy his burden of proof inasmuch as the only evidence to support two disputed findings of fact was the testimony of the plaintiff. "This court's review of the . . . factual findings is limited. Unless a finding of fact is clearly erroneous, it must be sustained . . . A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Shapero v. Mercede,
This court has reviewed the findings of fact, heard the objections thereto, and has reviewed a transcript of the hearing. See Practice Book §
Objection overruled. In accordance with the decision of the fact CT Page 2578-cx finder, judgment shall enter in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $9,500.00 plus costs.
THIM, J. CT Page 2578-cy