DocketNumber: Nos. CR97-502754, CR97-502755
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14010-a
Judges: FORD, JUDGE. MIANO, JUDGE. HOLDEN, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 10/23/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Application for review of sentence imposed by the Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford. Docket No. CR97-502754 and CR97-502755.
Robert Famiglietti, Esquire, Defense Counsel, for Petitioner.
Victor Carlucci, Esquire, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.
Sentence Affirmed
CT Page 14010-b
The sentencing court gave the petitioner considerable consideration to which he may have not have been entitled by reducing the original sentence from one hundred and twenty months to ninety two months. The position in the argument taken by the petitioner and his counsel before the Sentence Review Division focuses on the severity of a ten year sentence for violating the terms of a probation without consideration or specific knowledge of the underlying offenses which were committed. Counsel would argue before the Board that the offenses of sale of narcotics to undercover agents at the age of eighteen is neither a violent nor a serious offense. This Board takes issue with that position and finds that the sale of narcotics to the youth of our nation has indeed been a serious offense and have been violent in the impact it has had on the youth of America and must be viewed in that light.
The Panel is of the impression that the sentence that was imposed for the violation of probation took into account his history, the underlying offenses, the convictions while on probation and the pendency of three other criminal matters. It is well within a reasonable sentence to be imposed by the courts of this state. The panel notes that the sentencing judge took no action on the pending matters which were resolved favorably for the petitioner.
Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book §
CT Page 14010-c
The Division's is without authority to modify a sentence except in accordance with the provisions of Practice Book §
In reviewing the records as a whole, the Division finds that the sentencing court's actions were in accordance with the parameters of Connecticut Practice Book §
The sentence imposed was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
Accordingly, it is AFFIRMED.
FORD
MIANO
HOLDEN
Judges Ford, Miano and Holden, participated in this decision.
CT Page 14011