DocketNumber: No. CR99-184816
Citation Numbers: 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 15334-ie
Judges: FORD, MIANO, HOLDEN, JUDGES.
Filed Date: 12/26/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
Application for REVIEW OF SENTENCE imposed by the Superior Court, Judicial District of New Britain, G.A. 15, Docket Number CR99-184816
Mary Rose Palmese, Esq. For the State of Connecticut
George Lawler, Esq. For the Petitioner
SENTENCE AFFIRMED
On August 27, 1999, the Berlin Police, set up surveillance at a Berlin, Connecticut Motel based upon reports that Pierre Stewart may be involved in illegal drug activities. Plain clothes police officers approached the petitioner as he was using the pay phone and they engaged in conversation with him. The plain clothes police officers claim that the petitioner inquired as to what they were looking for and told them he had some percocet he could sell them. The officer agreed to buy the pills. The officer obtained four white pills from the petitioner in exchange for cash. The four white pills were identified at trial as being a generic brand of percocet. The petitioner testified at trial. The jury CT Page 15334-if returned a verdict of guilty on February 27, 2001.
Counsel for the petitioner urged the Division to consider that the petitioner was not a major drug dealer. The percocets the petitioner was convicted of selling were, in fact, prescribed to the petitioner. The petitioner was an armed forces veteran.
The Counsel for the State urged the Division to affirm the sentence and noted the five years to serve was mandatory nonsuspendable. Further, the petitioner addressed the Division and indicated that he was at all times drug addicted and five years was too much time for four pills.
The record reveals that the Trial Court prior to imposing sentence stated "the court was of the belief that you fully understood what it was you were doing, and the objective was monetary gain".
The Trial Court was without discretion in sentencing the petitioner to a mandatory non-suspendable minimum five year term of incarceration, based on the conviction by the jury of a non-drug dependent portion of the statute.
The Division is without authority to modify a sentence except in accordance with the provisions of Connecticut Practice Book §
In reviewing the sentence pursuant to § 43-28 of the Practice Book. The Division cannot conclude it was either inappropriate or disproportionate.
The sentence is AFFIRMED.
___________________, J. HOLDEN
___________________, J. MIANO
___________________, J. FORD
Miano, J., Ford, J. and Holden, J. participated in this decision. CT Page 15334-ig