DocketNumber: No. 62682; protests 315444-K and 315447-K (New York)
Citation Numbers: 42 Cust. Ct. 262
Judges: Oliver
Filed Date: 1/20/1959
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the merchandise was dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for photographic lenses and the items marked “B” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for.