DocketNumber: Court No. 72-2-00270
Judges: Watson
Filed Date: 12/18/1975
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
In this action plaintiff contests the classification as switches
Plaintiff’s argument that the primary function of these articles is to control a tape recorder as opposed to controlling the flow of electricity in an electrical circuit, is a distinction without a difference. In their function vis-á-vis the tape recorder, these switches make or break electrical circuits within the clear meaning of the classified provision.
Finally, I derive no support for the proposition that these foot switches are more than “switches” from the case of Pacific Instruments Corp. v. United States, 64 Cust. Ct. 520, C.D. 4028 (1970). Although the conclusion was expressed therein that certain foot controls and typewriter controls were “more than” switches, the
In light of the above, plaintiff has failed to prove the correctness of its claims which must, consequently, be overruled.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Item 685.90 oí the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, dutiable at the rate of 12% ad valorem.
Item 685.40 of the TSTJS, as modified, supra, dutiable at the rate of 8% ad valorem.
Plaintiff’s claim for classification as electrical articles, etc. under Hem 688.40 oi the TSTJS, as modified, supra, was abandoned and is, accordingly, dismissed.