Camp v. United States Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
)
JOSEPH A. CAMP, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 12-01729 (ABJ)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, )
)
Defendant. )
____________________________________)
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for summary
judgment. Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summ. J. [Dkt. # 28] (“Def.’s Mot.”).
Plaintiff Joseph A. Camp’s complaint seeks the release of documents from the government under
the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) related to a criminal case against him in the Western
District of Missouri. See Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. On April 23, 2013, defendant moved to dismiss the
complaint on the ground that plaintiff waived his rights under FOIA pursuant a plea agreement
with the government in his underlying criminal case. See Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of Def.’s
Mot. to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summ. J. [Dkt. # 28-2] at 3–5.
On May 6, 2013, plaintiff moved to stay the case on the ground that the government’s
motion was premature because, although he agreed that “there is a FOIA Waiver and that he
entered into the terms of that waiver knowingly and voluntarily,” the plea agreement had not yet
been accepted by the court hearing his criminal case, so the motion was premature. Pl.’s Mot. to
Stay Proceedings Until After Sentencing [Dkt. # 31] ¶¶ 1–3. Plaintiff asked the Court to stay the
case “until the Plea-agreement has been accepted in full by the Criminal Court in the Western
District of Missouri, and Plaintiff has been sentenced to the terms of the plea-agreement, at
which time the Plaintiff will not contest the Defendant’s Motion for Dismissal.” Id. ¶ 6
(emphasis omitted). The Court granted the motion to stay and ordered defendant to file a status
report with the Court on September 6, 2012 advising the Court of the status of plaintiff’s
criminal case. Minute Order of May 6, 2013.
On July 8, 2013, plaintiff moved to continue the stay because he had filed a notice of
appeal of his criminal case. Mot. to Continue Stay [Dkt. # 34]. The Court denied the motion as
moot because a stay was already in place and reiterated its order to defendant to file a status
report by September 6, 2013 regarding plaintiff’s criminal matter. Minute Order of July 15,
2013. Defendant filed a status report on September 6, 2013, advising that plaintiff had been
sentenced consistent with the terms of his plea agreement but that plaintiff had filed a notice of
appeal in his criminal matter. Status Report [Dkt. # 35] ¶¶ 3–4. See also Pl.’s Mot. to Continue
Stay [Dkt. # 36] (advising Court of status of his criminal case and his filing of an appeal). The
Court granted plaintiff’s motion to continue the stay and ordered a further status report by
December 13, 2013 regarding the status of plaintiff’s criminal matter. Minute Order of
September 13, 2013.
On November 21, 2013, defendant filed a status report advising that plaintiff moved to
dismiss his appeal, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. Status
Report [Dkt. # 38] ¶¶ 2–3 (attaching judgment and mandate issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal [Dkt. # 38-2]).
In light of plaintiff’s statement that he would not contest defendant’s motion to dismiss
this case once his plea was accepted and the judgment against him became final, and the fact that
plaintiff’s criminal case is now concluded, the Court will grant defendant’s motion for summary
2
judgment. The Court will deny defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot. A separate order will
issue.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON
United States District Judge
DATE: November 25, 2013
3