McKinzie v. Double Tree Suites

FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUN 1 9 2012
Clerk, us o; t .
Courts to.r the ;;~fr~c~ ~fnckr uptcy
1
o umb1a
)
Melinda McKinzie, )
)
Plainti~f, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 12 0991
)
Double Tree Suites (WDC) eta!., )
)
Defendants. )
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs prose complaint and application to proceed
in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction.
The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth
generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available
only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the
amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least
plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to
plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).
Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing Double Tree Suites located in the
District, its purported parent company in Florida, and a list of other defendants located in the
District and Palm Beach, Florida. Plaintiff sues defendants for injuries she allegedly suffered as
a result of their "negligent, wrongful, false and malicious acts" on May 18, 2009, Compl.~ 2, and
she demands $1.5 million in damages. !d. ~ 1. The complaint presents neither a federal question
I
~
(
-----~--------------------·-·---·-·----~··--·-·--------·
nor a basis for diversity jurisdiction because plaintiff and some of the defendants reside in the
District. See Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) ("For jurisdiction to exist
under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say
that the plaintiff may not be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.") (citations omitted). 1 A
separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
United States District Judge
Date: June / ~12
1
Plaintiffs recourse may lie, if at all, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
2