DocketNumber: Civil Action No. 2011-2033
Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell
Filed Date: 11/16/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F l L E D ) NOV l 6 2011 Deborah Diane Fletcher, ) ) Clerk, U.S. Distrlct and plaintiff ) Bankruptcy §ourts ) v. ) Civil Action No. 5 ) . Dep’t of HUD, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’ s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis The application will be granted and the case will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2)(B)(ii). Under that statute, the Court is required to dismiss a case "at any time" it determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff is a resident of Miami, Florida, suing the "Dept. of HUD-l\/Ianager[,] Florida State of Dept. of HUD." Compl. Caption. The crux of plaintiffs rambling complaint is that she allegedly took a class in April 2011 for first-time home buyers in Miami and that defendant "refus[e]d to help [her] . . . purchase her home as a first-time-home-buyer, for a low income individual." Compl. at l, 5. She "is charging the defendant with prejudice [and] is asking for the price of a single family home and the price of prejudice." Ia'. at 5~6. A plaintiff s "[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . . . ." BelIAtlantz'c Corp. v. Twombly,550 U.S. 544
, 555 (2007) (citations omitted); see Aklieselskabet AF 2]. Nov. 2001 v. Fame Jeans, Inc.,525 F.3d 8
, 16 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 2008) ("We have never accepted ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’ because a complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.") (quoting Kowal v. MCI Commc'ns Corp.,16 F.3d 1271
, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). Plaintiff does not state the basis of federal court jurisdiction and her alleged facts do not state a cognizable claim. Therefore, the complaint will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. ) / United'States District J/e(dge Date: November@// , 2011