Burton v. State

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WILLIAM BURTON, §
§ No. 699, 2013
Defendant Below-Appellant, §
§ Court Below: Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, §
§
Plaintiff Below-Appellee. §
Submitted: June 8, 2016
Decided: June 8, 2016
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
This 8th day of June 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the
record below, it appears to the Court that the defendant in this case alleges that his
conviction should be set aside because his home was searched in violation of the
Fourth Amendment and that he should have received a new trial because of the
misconduct at the OCME. Both of these arguments were addressed and rejected in
written decisions of our Superior Court, and we affirm the defendant’s conviction
on the basis of the Superior Court’s decisions.1
1
See State v. Burton, 2013 WL 4852342 (Del. Super. Sept. 9, 2013); State v. Burton, ID. No.
1301022871 (Del. Super. Nov. 30, 2015); see also Cannon v. State, 127 A.3d 1164, 1167–68
(Del. 2015); Aricidiacono v. State, 125 A.3d 677, 678–80 (Del. 2015); Brown v. State, 117 A.3d
568, 580–81 (Del. 2015); Brown v. State, 108 A.3d 1201, 1205–06 (Del. 2015).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Superior Court’s judgments
of September 9, 2013 and November 30, 2015 are AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.
Chief Justice
2