Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.

SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE
l The Circle, Suite 2
GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
E. SCOTT BRADLEY
JUDGE
September 25, 2018
Louis J. Rizzo, Jr., Esquire
D. Miika Roggio, Esquire
Silver, McDonald & Friedman Reger Rizzo & Damall LLP
1523 Concord Pike, Suite 200
1010 North Bancroft Parkway, Suite 22
Wilmington, DE 19805 Brandywine Plaza East
Wilmington, DE 19803
Joseph R. Fowler, Esquire
Fowler Hirtzel McNulty Spaulding
2000 Market Street
Suite 550 §
Philadelphia, PA 19107 ~=``»``
¢/)
'-"6
¢_'},’
``U
N
RE: Pavik v. George & Lynch, Inc.
C.A. No. Sl4C-01-006 ESB
CD
Dear Counsel:
l"
5
b
_D
so
C)
-~¢
:-``C
ca
2
nos xJSsns
h'
0
A.l
V.l
20
I have denied George & Lynch Inc.’s Motion for Reargument of my decision gr:lming'<
summary judgment in favor of E. J. Breneman. George & Lynch Inc.’s motion raises the same
arguments that I previously considered and rejected. I am satisfied that my earlier decision
remains correct.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Very truly yours,
E. Scott Bradley
ESB:tll
Prothonotary’s Office
cc:
Counsel of Record