Toll Brothers Builders, Hockessin Chase LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. Hoban, Michael Klein v. Frederick Williams

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Toll Brothers builders, Hockessin )
LP, Michael Brown, Timothy J. )
Hoban, Michael Klein, )
)
Petitioners, )
v. ) C.A. No. N24M-06-136
)
Frederick Williams, )
)
Respondent. )
Date Submitted: August 1, 2024
Date Decided: August 7, 2024
ORDER
AND NOW TO WIT, this 7th day of August, 2024, the Court having
considered Respondent’s Motion for Recusal,1 the relevant case law, and the record,
IT APPEARS THAT:
1. Respondent argues this judge should recuse herself because she dismissed his
case,2 “showed no regards for the facts of the case,” and discriminated against
him because of his race.3
2. When faced with a claim of personal prejudice of the judge, the judge is
required to engage in a two-part analysis:
First, [s]he must, as a matter of subjective belief, be
1
Mot. for Recusal of the Honorable Jan R. Jurden, Trans. ID 73965517 (Aug. 6, 2024) (“Motion”).
2
Respondent is referring to Case No. N22C-12-122-JRJ. See July 13, 2023 Order, Trans. ID
70377281 (Jul. 13, 2023).
3
Motion.
satisfied that [s]he can proceed to hear the cause free of
bias or prejudice concerning that party. Second, even if the
judge believes that [s]he has no bias, situations may arise
where, actual bias aside, there is an appearance of bias
sufficient to cause doubt as to the judge’s impartiality.4
3. With regard to the subjective test, this judge is satisfied she can proceed to
hear the pending motion for sanctions against Respondent free of any bias or
prejudice against him. This judge bears no ill will and harbors no animosity
toward Respondent.
4. With regard to the objective test, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that
a judge is not required to recuse herself because of adverse rulings in the same
or prior proceedings.5
WHEREFORE, the Respondent’s Motion for Recusal is DENIED.
/s/ Jan R. Jurden
Jan R. Jurden, President Judge
Original to Prothonotary:
cc: Anthony N. Delcollo, Esq.
Frederick Williams
4
Los v. Los, 595 A.2d, 381, 384-85 (Del. Supr. 1991).
5
Id. at 385.
2