I consider the holding here is in conflict with the holding in the case of Fuller v. Darnell, 100 Fla. 773, 129 So.2d 915, in which case we quoted with approval a paragraph from Chief Justice WHITFIELD'S opinion in Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. v. Hayes, 65 Fla. 1, to the effect that the husband cannot recover for the wife's mental pain and suffering in cases of this kind. See also third headnote in the Fuller v. Darnell case, which I think correctly states the law and should be adhered to.