Citation Numbers： 119 So. 393, 97 Fla. 23
Judges： PER CURIAM. —
Filed Date： 1/16/1929
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 1/12/2023
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
WHITFIELD, P. J., AND STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
United States v. Bobby Jenkins , 822 F.3d 1213 ( 2016 )
State v. McFadden , 772 So. 2d 1209 ( 2000 )
Delta Truck Brokers, Inc. v. King , 142 So. 2d 273 ( 1962 )
Joseph Peter Clarke v. United States , 184 So. 3d 1107 ( 2016 )
Washington v. Mayo , 77 So. 2d 620 ( 1955 )
State v. Smith , 160 Fla. 288 ( 1948 )
State v. Jones , 47 So. 3d 1096 ( 2010 )
Morrell v. State , 297 So. 2d 579 ( 1974 )
State v. Keirn , 720 So. 2d 1085 ( 1998 )
Pennick v. State , 453 So. 2d 542 ( 1984 )
Reis v. State , 248 So. 2d 666 ( 1971 )
State v. Dixon , 193 So. 2d 62 ( 1966 )
Vazquez v. State , 405 So. 2d 177 ( 1981 )
Barber v. State , 413 So. 2d 482 ( 1982 )
Andress v. Coleman , 320 So. 2d 451 ( 1975 )
Ellis v. State , 100 Fla. 27 ( 1930 )
United States v. Hartsfield , 387 F. Supp. 16 ( 1975 )