DocketNumber: No. 69293
Citation Numbers: 533 So. 2d 293
Judges: Barkett, Ehrlich, Grimes, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
Filed Date: 11/10/1988
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/29/2022
This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the referee’s report. Neither party has filed a petition for review.
The referee found that respondent entered into a loan transaction with a former client. The referee found that there was no attorney-client relationship with regard to the transaction; that the relationship of borrower and lender was created at the instance of the former client who proposed to respondent that he borrow money from her; and that the former client/lender was competent to handle her business affairs.
The respondent has had two prior disciplinary proceedings, each of which resulted in a private reprimand. The referee recommends that respondent receive a public reprimand. We approve the referee’s report. We hereby reprimand John E. Hankal for professional misconduct.
The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the respondent. Judgment is entered against John E. Hankal for costs in the amount of $1351.30, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.