Citation Numbers: 143 So. 638, 106 Fla. 779
Judges: Terrell, Whitfield, Brown, Davis, Ellis
Filed Date: 9/27/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
It is not a question of the applicability of the remedy of Quo Warranto but whether such action was necessary in view of the statutory remedy invoked by Relator. Sec. 444 C. G. L. The maxim "nemo debit vis vexari pro una; et eadem causa" is applicable. The relator may obtain the same reasons upon the same evidence against this same party in the statutory proceeding which he began as he could obtain by Quo Warranto. I think therefore that the motion to quash should be granted.
North Dade Water Co. v. Florida State Turnpike Auth. , 114 So. 2d 458 ( 1959 )
State Ex Rel. West v. Gray , 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1109 ( 1954 )
Alsdorf v. Broward County , 333 So. 2d 457 ( 1976 )
City of Miami v. Bethel , 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1271 ( 1953 )
State Ex Rel. Scaldeferri v. Sandstrom , 285 So. 2d 409 ( 1973 )