Judges: Charlie Crist Attorney General
Filed Date: 12/15/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Charlie Green Lee County Clerk of Circuit Court Post Office Box 2469 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2469
Dear Mr. Green:
As Clerk of the Circuit Court you are conducting an audit for the Board of County Commissioners of Lee County of the funds paid to the District 21 Medical Examiner's Office. In this regard you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following questions:
1. Is a district medical examiner a county or state officer for purposes of Chapters
2. Are the fees received by the Medical Examiner's Office for services relating to that office personal income of the chief medical examiner?
3. Are the expert witness fees authorized by section
4. May the medical examiner's office charge a fee in excess of the costs authorized by section
5. Is a district medical examiner's office authorized to charge the public a cremation authorization fee?
6. Is a county legally authorized to fund with county funds a privately-held 401(k) pension plan for the chief medical examiner, associate medical examiners, and employees; or should the chief medical examiner, associate medical examiners, and employees be part of the Florida Retirement System under Chapter
7. Must all income and revenues received by the chief medical examiner from the counties and other revenue sources be deposited in a public depository under Chapter
8. Must associate medical examiners file financial disclosure statements pursuant to section
9. Is the medical examiner required to have an annual financial audit as described in section
According to information you have submitted to this office and information provided by the District 21 Medical Examiner's Office, an audit of the medical examiner's office is currently underway. A number of questions have arisen concerning the nature of the medical examiner's office and the methods of accounting for funds of the office.
The District 21 Medical Examiner's Office covers Lee, Hendry and Glades counties. The physical facilities and the equipment for that office are located in and owned by Lee County. The medical examiner's office submits an annual budget to the county. The budget consists of anticipated operational expenses and professional fees of the medical examiner's office. The only fees specified in the budget are fees for autopsies, narratives and declined jurisdiction. An interlocal agreement entered into between the medical examiner's office and the counties in the district specify percentages of payment for budgeted operational expenses of the office. Each county directly compensates the medical examiner for the professional fees, toxicology and transportation costs attributable to that particular county.
The current chief medical examiner for District 21 was appointed by the Governor in 2001. No written contract was suggested or offered to her by Lee County. She operates the medical examiner's office as a professional association, as did her predecessors. The current chief medical examiner does not engage in a separate private medical practice at the medical examiner's office.
A number of the questions presented in your request require some determination or characterization of the working arrangement between the medical examiner and the county. It is clear from the information submitted both by you and by the medical examiner that no written contract or agreement exists defining the working roles and responsibilities of each party, nor has that office ever operated under such an agreement. This office has no ability to characterize the arrangement between these parties in the absence of any written contract or other document providing the terms under which the medical examiner's office operates. It is my understanding that the county and the medical examiner are currently negotiating a contract establishing the terms under which the District 21 Medical Examiner's Office and Lee County will operate in the future.
Question One
Chapter
"[P]opulation, judicial circuits of the state, geographical size of the area of coverage, availability of trained personnel, death rate by both natural and unnatural causes, and similar related factors. No county may be divided in the creation of a district. However, this limitation shall not prohibit cooperative arrangements among the several districts."2
District medical examiners are appointed by the Governor for a three-year term of office.3 The grounds for discipline for a medical examiner are set forth in section
Medical examiner districts are distinct and independent statutory entities created for restricted purposes; they are not state agencies, as their prescribed powers are definitely confined to a less than statewide area.4 Similarly, while there appear to be several medical examiner districts that encompass only one county,5 the districts' mandates may reach across county lines.6 Officers of a special district "are neither state nor county officers."7 Thus, it is my opinion that a district medical examiner is a district officer rather than a state or county officer.
More particularly, Chapter
Chapter
Part III, Chapter
"a local unit of special purpose, as opposed to general-purpose, government within a limited boundary, created by general law, special act, local ordinance, or by rule of the Governor and Cabinet. The special purpose or purposes of special districts are implemented by specialized functions and related prescribed powers."
Among the legislative purposes for adoption of the act was to:
"(c) Improve communication and coordination between special districts and other local entities with respect to ad valorem taxation, non-ad valorem assessment collection, special district elections, and local government comprehensive planning.
(d) Move toward greater uniformity in special district elections and non-ad valorem assessment collection procedures at the local level without hampering the efficiency and effectiveness of the current procedures."13
While a medical examiner's district is in the nature of a special district because of its specialized function and geographical limitations, it is not a unit of government with the authority to impose taxes, nor is the medical examiner subject to election. Thus, it does not appear that a medical examiner district is subject to the management and reporting requirements of Part III, Chapter
Question Two
I understand your second and third questions to be attempts to characterize the nature of fees coming into the Office of the District Medical Examiner.
Section
"District medical examiners and associate medical examiners shall be entitled to compensation and such reasonable salary and fees as are established by the board of county commissioners in the respective districts."
Section
"(1) Fees, salaries, and expenses may be paid from the general funds or any other funds under the control of the board of county commissioners. The district medical examiner shall submit an annual budget to the board of county commissioners. (2) In the event that an examination or autopsy is performed by the district medical examiner or his or her associate upon a body when the death occurred outside the district, the governmental body requesting the examination or autopsy shall pay the fee for such services. (3) When a body is transported to the district medical examiner or his or her associate, transportation costs, if any, shall be borne by the county in which the death occurred. Nothing within this chapter shall preclude payment for services to the district medical examiner by the state, either in part or on a matching basis. (4) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, if an examination, investigation, or autopsy is performed by the district medical examiner or his or her associate upon the body of a person who died while in the custody of a facility or institution operated by a state agency, that state agency shall pay for such services and for any costs of transporting the body to the district medical examiner. (5) Autopsy and laboratory facilities utilized by the district medical examiner or his or her associates may be provided on a permanent or contractual basis by the counties within the district."
Clearly, the medical examiner may be receiving income from a number of sources: the county, other counties in the medical examiner district, the state, or another governmental body. These funds are public funds and the governmental entities paying these funds are responsible for making sure they are utilized for the purposes for which they were appropriated and paid.
In the case of the county, the medical examiner submits his or her annual budget and the county appropriates and pays funds to meet the budget requests of the medical examiner. It is the responsibility of the county to ensure that county funds are used to meet county purposes. Thus, the county must satisfy itself that the medical examiner is using those funds paid by the county to do the county's business. Whether this accountability takes the form of a private audit requirement in the medical examiner's contract or some other means of accounting for these expenditures of county funds is a determination that must be made by the county commission.14
Question Three
Section
Section
"(1) The term ``expert witness' as used herein shall apply to any witness who offers himself or herself in the trial of any civil action as an expert witness or who is subpoenaed to testify in such capacity before a state attorney in the investigation of a criminal matter, or before a grand jury, and who is permitted by the court to qualify and testify as such, upon any matter pending before any court. (2) Any expert or skilled witness who shall have testified in any cause shall be allowed a witness fee including the cost of any exhibits used by such witness in the amount of $10 per hour or such amount as the trial judge may deem reasonable, and the same shall be taxed as costs."
These fees are payable by the party to the civil action who calls the expert witness and are ultimately taxed as costs by the court in favor of the prevailing party and against the losing party.
Section
"If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify about it in the form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial."
Section 914.06, Florida Statutes, allows for the compensation of expert witnesses in criminal cases:
"In a criminal case when the state or an indigent defendant requires the services of an expert witness whose opinion is relevant to the issues of the case, the court shall award reasonable compensation to the expert witness that shall be taxed and paid by the county as costs in the same manner as other costs."
Finally, section
"Upon receipt of the petition of the state attorney, the county court judge shall schedule the time and place of the inquest. The county court judge shall send her or his warrant for witnesses, to be served by a sheriff, commanding the witnesses to come to the inquest to be examined and to declare their knowledge concerning the death. Any witness appearing at, or summoned to appear at, an inquest shall be entitled to the same compensation as that provided by law for witnesses in any criminal proceeding held in the county."
The statutes make provision for expert witness fees to be paid to the district medical examiner in a number of situations involving civil and criminal proceedings. These fees may be paid by the state, the county, or a private party, but are all income to the Office of the District Medical Examiner when the medical examiner is testifying in that capacity. In the case of public moneys from the state attorney or county, the public agency paying the fees must satisfy itself that the moneys are being paid for an appropriate purpose. The medical examiner is charged with ensuring that funds paid into the medical examiner's office are used for the purposes of that office.
Question Four
You ask whether a fee may be charged by the medical examiner's office for autopsy photographs in excess of the costs authorized by the Public Records Law.
The Public Records Law requires that "[e]very person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and examined by any person desiring to do so, at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public record or the custodian's designee."17 Accompanying this right of inspection is the right to copy public records:
"The custodian shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record upon payment of the fee prescribed by law or, if a fee is not prescribed by law, for duplicated copies of not more than 14 inches by 8 ½ inches, upon payment of not more than 15 cents per one-sided copy, and for all other copies, upon payment of the actual cost of duplication of the record."
A "public record," for purposes of the law, includes "photographs."18 I would note that the Public Records Law recognizes that, under certain circumstances, additional fees may be charged for the copying of public records:
"If the nature or volume of public records requested to be inspected, examined, or copied pursuant to this subsection is such as to require extensive use of information technology resources or extensive clerical or supervisory assistance by personnel of the agency involved, or both, the agency may charge, in addition to the actual cost of duplication, a special service charge, which shall be reasonable and shall be based on the cost incurred for such extensive use of information technology resources or the labor cost of the personnel providing the service that is actually incurred by the agency or attributable to the agency for the clerical and supervisory assistance required, or both. ``Information technology resources' means data processing hardware and software and services, communications, supplies, personnel, facility resources, maintenance, and training."19
The inspection and copying of autopsy photographs or video or audio recordings of autopsy proceedings are treated distinctly in section
"A photograph or video or audio recording of an autopsy in the custody of a medical examiner is confidential and exempt from the requirements of s.
Thus, while autopsy reports and records are within the scope of public records for purposes of Chapter
However, to the extent that persons or agencies who are authorized by section
Question Five
You ask whether the medical examiner's office is authorized to charge the public a cremation authorization fee.
Medical examiners, like other public officers, have no legal claim for official services rendered, except when, and to the extent that, compensation is provided by law, and when no compensation is so provided rendition of such services is deemed to be gratuitous.22 I am aware of no authority in Chapter 406, or elsewhere in the statutes, for the medical examiner to charge a cremation authorization fee. In the absence of any such statutory authorization, it is my opinion that this service is to be provided without charge to the public as a service of the office.
Question Six
Resolution of this question requires consideration of the employment status of the medical examiner and his or her staff. In the absence of any agreement establishing the employment arrangement between the medical examiner and the county, this office has no basis for such a determination.
With regard to coverage of particular employees of the medical examiner's office under the provisions of Chapter
Question Seven
Section
"Each county depository shall be a qualified public depository as defined in s.
Accounts in county depositories are subject at all times to the inspection and examination by the county auditor and by the Auditor General.23
As discussed in Question One, the Office of Medical Examiner is in the nature of a district office, not a county office. I am aware of no provision of Chapter
Question Eight
Any question of the applicability of the Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees, Part III, Chapter
Question Nine
Section
Sincerely,
Charlie Crist Attorney General
"a formal, nonadversary, nonjury presentation of evidence concerning a death, discovered by the medical examiner, state attorney, and law enforcement agency during their respective examinations and investigations into the death."
Rawls v. State Ex Rel. Nolan , 98 Fla. 103 ( 1929 )
Gavagan v. Marshall , 160 Fla. 154 ( 1948 )
Town of Palm Beach v. City of West Palm Beach , 1951 Fla. LEXIS 946 ( 1951 )
Bair v. Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District , 144 So. 2d 818 ( 1962 )