Judges: Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General Prepared by: Patricia R. Gleason, Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 10/30/1978
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Thomas A. Bustin City Attorney Clearwater
QUESTION:
Is the City of Clearwater authorized by the provisions of Ch. 165, F. S., or Ch. 166, F. S., to create a special taxing district for the purpose of surface water management and weed control of a privately owned lake?
SUMMARY:
The City of Clearwater is not authorized by the Formation of Local Governments Act or the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act to create a special taxing district for the purpose of surface water management and weed control of a privately owned lake.
Section 1(a), Art. VII, State Const., provides, in relevant part, that ``[n]o tax shall be levied except in pursuance of law.' With regard to special districts, s. 9(a), Art. VII, State Const., states that such districts may ``be authorized by law to levy ad valorem taxes and may be authorized by general law to levy other taxes for their respective purposes except ad valorem taxes on intangible personal property and taxes prohibited by this constitution.' Section 9(b), Art. VII, provides, inter alia:
[a]d valorem taxes . . . Shall not be levied in excess of the following millages upon the assessed value of real estate and tangible personal property: . . . for . . . special districts a millage authorized by law approved by vote of the electors . . . .
From the foregoing, it is evident that the State Constitution imposes two conditions upon the levy of ad valorem taxes by a special district: the special district must be authorized by general or special law to levy ad valorem taxes; and the tax must not be levied in excess of the millage authorized by law and approved by vote of the electors within the district.
My examination of the Formation of Local Governments Act, prescribing the exclusive procedure for forming of dissolving special districts, reveals no provision therein which authorizes a municipality to create a special taxing district for the purposes described in your letter, or to confer upon such district the power to levy ad valorem taxes within the district. Cf. s.
Therefore, in the absence of a statute authorizing the City of Clearwater to create a special taxing district for the purposes of surface water management and weed control of privately owned fresh water lakes, the city is not empowered to do so. See AGO 078-92 noting that a special district, however created, is not ipso facto a special taxing district.
In reaching the foregoing conclusion, I have not overlooked the broad powers of home rule which have been granted to municipalities under Ch. 166, F. S. However, the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act prohibits municipalities from exercising powers which have been expressly prohibited or preempted to the state by the Constitution. Section
Prepared by: Patricia R. Gleason, Assistant Attorney General