Judges: Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
Filed Date: 10/31/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Mr. Bruce G. Duncan Assistant County Attorney Lake County Board of County Commissioners Post Office Box 7800 Tavares, Florida 32778-7800
Dear Mr. Duncan:
On behalf of the Lake County Board of County Commissioners, you ask the following questions:
1. May Lake County use proceeds derived from its tourist development tax revenues for the acquisition of land that will be used by the State of Florida as a site for the Florida Agriculture Museum?
2. May Lake County use proceeds derived from local government infrastructure surtax revenues for the acquisition of land that will be used by the State of Florida as a site for the Florida Agriculture Museum?
3. May Lake County transfer or lease to the state land that is already owned by the county?
In sum:
1. The use of tourist development tax revenues to acquire land within the county that would then be used by the state as the location for the State Agriculture Museum would not violate section
2. While the acquisition of land is included within the term "infrastructure" as defined for purposes of section
3. Section
Question One
Section
The purpose and intent of section
Subsection (5) of the act sets forth various purposes for which revenues from the tax may be expended. Pursuant to section
"To acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, sports stadiums, sports arenas, coliseums, or auditoriums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied. . . ." (e.s.)
Thus, the statute authorizes the use of tourist development tax revenues for a museum. Section
According to your letter, the county would acquire the property, using tourist development tax revenues. The county would then either transfer or lease the property to the state as the location of the State Agriculture Museum.4 In light of the above, it appears that the use of tourist development tax revenues to acquire land within the county that would then be used by the state as the location for the State Agriculture Museum would not violate section
Question Two
Section
The funds raised by the local government infrastructure surtax and any interest earned thereon must be expended within the county to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure and to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources.7
The statute prohibits the use of the proceeds and any interest earned thereon "for operational expenses of any infrastructure[.]"8 The term "infrastructure" is defined to mean:
"a. Any fixed capital expenditure or fixed capital outlay associated with the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of public facilities which have a life expectancy of 5 or more years and any land acquisition, land improvement, design, and engineering costs related thereto.
b. A fire department vehicle, an emergency medical service vehicle, a sheriff's office vehicle, a police department vehicle, or any other vehicle, and such equipment necessary to outfit the vehicle for its official use or equipment that has a life expectancy of at least 5 years."9
Thus, the definition of "infrastructure" includes expenditures not only for the construction or improvement of public facilities having a life expectancy of five years or more, but also the land acquisition or improvement costs related thereto.
An examination of the legislative history surrounding the enactment of section
Accordingly, while the acquisition of land is included within the term "infrastructure" as defined for purposes of section
Question Three
Section
"If . . . the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof . . . should desire any real or personal property that may be owned by any county of this state or by its board of county commissioners, for public or community interest and welfare, then the . . . state or such political subdivision, agency, . . . may apply to the board of county commissioners for a conveyance or lease of such property. Such board, if satisfied that such property is required for such use and is not needed for county purposes, may thereupon convey or lease the same at private sale to the applicant for such price, whether nominal or otherwise, as such board may fix, regardless of the actual value of such property. The fact of such application being made, the purpose for which such property is to be used, and the price or rent therefor shall be set out in a resolution duly adopted by such board. In the case of a lease, the term of such lease shall be recited in such resolution. No advertisement shall be required."
In Attorney General Opinion 71-49, this office stated that the state may accept as lessee long-term leases on county or municipal owned property and expend state funds for the construction of buildings thereon.
Accordingly, the foregoing statute authorizes the county to lease or sell to the state for a nominal amount property owned by the county but not needed for county purposes.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
RAB/tjw