Judges: Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
Filed Date: 8/6/1992
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
JulieAnn Rico Chairman, Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission
QUESTION:
Is the Judicial Nominating Commission required by s. 11(c), Art. V, State Const., to nominate three persons for a county court judicial vacancy when the Governor has certified the remainder of the incumbent judges's term to be filled by election on the September 1, 1992, ballot and the elected judge will be seated in January 1993?
SUMMARY:
Section 11(c), Art. V, State Const., requires the appropriate judicial nominating commission to make nominations of persons to fill county court vacancies for the remainder of a judicial term.
As Chairperson of the Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission you inquire about the duties of the commission pursuant to s. 11(c), Art. V, State Const., in the following situation. A county judge in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit has resigned from office effective September 15, 1992. The Governor has accepted the resignation and an election has been scheduled for September 1, 1992, to fill the vacancy. The elected judge will be seated in January 1993. Thus, there will be a period between the incumbent judge's resignation on September 15, 1992, and the commencement of the new judge's term in January 1993, when there is no judge in this seat. You ask whether the Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission is required by the Florida Constitution to provide the Governor with the names of suitable candidates to fill the position of county court judge for this interim period.
The Florida Constitution makes specific provisions for filling judicial vacancies. The Constitution states that a separate judicial nominating commission shall exist for each judicial circuit which encompasses all trial courts within the circuit.1 Pursuant to s. 11(b), Art. V, State Const.:
The governor shall fill each vacancy . . . on a county court by appointing for a term ending on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January of the year following the next primary and general election, one of not fewer than three persons nominated by the appropriate judicial nominating commission. An election shall be held to fill that judicial office for the term of the office beginning at the end of the appointed term. (e.s.)
The nomination process is set forth as follows:
The nominations shall be made within thirty days from the occurrence of a vacancy unless the period is extended by the governor for a time not to exceed thirty days. The governor shall make the appointment within sixty days after the nominations have been certified to him.2 (e.s.)
The word "shall," in its ordinary and common usage has a compulsory or mandatory meaning rather than a permissive one3 and, by utilizing this terminology, the framersof the Constitution mandate this procedure for nominating persons to fill judicial vacancies.4 As this office has previously determined, "[a] judicial nominating commission has theconstitutional duty to supply the Governor with the names of at least three nominees or candidates for appointment to the judicial office in which there is a vacancy."5 (e.s.)
The Attorney General cannot advise any officer to disregard a constitutional direction or mandate; on the contrary, such a directive must be given effect until judicially declared invalid.6 Further, I am not aware of any exception or exemption from the constitutional mandate for vacancies which are of a very limited duration. On the contrary, the Florida Supreme Court recently determined that this process should be utilized to fill a judicial vacancy which would exist from August 1, 1992, to January 5, 1993.7
Thus, it is my opinion that the Fifteenth Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission is required by s. 11(c), Art. V, State Const., to submit not fewer than three names to the Governor to fill a judicial vacancy on a county court for the period between September 15, 1992, and January 5, 1993.8
In light of this problem, the Legislature may wish to give this matter consideration.
Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel , 1952 Fla. LEXIS 989 ( 1952 )
State Ex Rel. Watson v. Caldwell , 156 Fla. 618 ( 1945 )
Spector v. Glisson , 305 So. 2d 777 ( 1974 )
Thayer v. State , 335 So. 2d 815 ( 1976 )
ADAMS PACKING ASS'N, INC. v. Florida Dept. of Citrus , 352 So. 2d 569 ( 1977 )
Alsop v. Pierce , 155 Fla. 185 ( 1944 )
Department of Rev. of Fla. v. Young American Bldrs. , 330 So. 2d 864 ( 1976 )