Judges: Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General Prepared by: Michael Parrish, Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 2/6/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
QUESTION:
Are municipal employees who are members of National Guard units entitled, under s.
SUMMARY:
Municipal employees who are members of the Florida National Guard are not entitled under s.
Your question is answered in the negative.
The leave of absence authorized by s.
"The troops ordered into the service of the state for the enforcement of the law, the preservation of the peace, or for the security of the rights or lives of citizens, protection of property, or ceremonies shall be deemed to be in active service. Officers and enlisted men employed under orders of the governor in recruiting, making tours of instruction, inspection of troops, armories, storehouses, campsites, rifle ranges, and military property, sitting on general or special courts-martial, boards of examination, courts of inquiry or boards of officers or making and assisting in the physical examinations, shall be deemed to be in active service when it is so specified in orders."
It is clear from the foregoing that the weekend training and "armory drill" meetings of the National Guard are not included in the definition of "active service." Furthermore, such meetings do not appear to come within the meaning of the phrase "field exercises," because given its obvious and logical meaning that phrase must be understood as a reference to exercises held in the field and properly ordered to be held under the provisions of Ch.
ordered to active service by the state," but specifically provides that the leave authorized by that section does not include "armory drills or multiple training assemblies." (Emphasis supplied.) Rule 22A-8.16B provides that state employees who are members of the National Guard may be granted leave without pay "on all days during which the employee is performing ordered inactive duty training (armory drill or multiple training assemblies)." Although these leave rules do not govern municipal employees, they are indicative of the interpretation placed upon the statutory provision in question by the state agency charged with implementation of the statute, and such interpretations are entitled to great weight. Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of Florida,
For the foregoing reasons, I am of the view that a municipal employee who is a member of the Florida National Guard is not entitled to the benefits of s.