Judges: Harold F. X. Purnell Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 2/5/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Guy H. Amason, Jr. Attorney for Iona-McGregor Fire Protection and Rescue Service District
Harry Schooley Lee County Property Appraiser Ft. Myers
QUESTIONS:
1. Is the property appraiser, at the expense of his office, required to furnish to the governing board of the Iona-McGregor Fire District a special assessment roll assessing each parcel of real property within the district under the provisions of Ch. 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, Laws of Florida?
2. Is the district obliged to pay and is the property appraiser entitled to be paid for services that he is authorized and required to provide the district by the terms of Chs. 75-421 and 76-402, Laws of Florida?
SUMMARY:
Chapter 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, imposes upon the board of commissioners of the Iona-McGregor Fire Protection and Rescue Service District the duty and responsibility as well as the expense of preparing the special assessment roll for the district. Such acts impose upon the Lee County Property Appraiser both the duty of furnishing that part of the county real property assessment roll, or county tax roll, as lists all taxable real property situate within the boundaries of the district and the duty of entering and extending the assessments made by the district's governing board on the county tax roll. The compensation to the property appraiser for the performance of such duties is that provided in Ch. 76-402, which method of compensation or reimbursement is substantially the same as that provided in s.
AS TO QUESTION 1:
While these statutes are not models of clarity and the terminology thereof is somewhat ambiguous, upon examination of the whole of Ch. 75-421, Laws of Florida, as amended by Ch. 76-402, Laws of Florida, I am led to the conclusion that the Legislature did not intend, not in terms mandate, that the county property appraiser prepare at his expense and provide without charge to the governing board of the district a special assessment roll assessing each parcel of taxable real property within the district. No provision of the subject statutes empowers the district or its governing board to levy ad valorem taxes; nor is any excise or license tax, which must be authorized by general law, involved. See s. 9, Art. VII, State Const. Section 5(1) of Ch. 75-421 expressly and specifically empowers the district's governing board ``to levy special assessments against the taxable real estate within the district to provide funds for the purpose of this district.' The rate of such special assessments ``shall be fixed by a resolution of the board as provided in this subsection,' though the maximum rates of assessment are fixed by the Legislature. See s. 5(2), Ch. 75-421. In ``making assessment rolls' the governing board of the district is required to consider ``size of property, fire hazard, and protection provided.' See s. 5(3), Ch. 75-421. While the making of special assessments is an exercise of the taxing power, such local assessments are not ad valorem or property taxes and are governed by entirely different principles of law. See 29A Fla. Jur. Special Assessments ss. 3, 5, and 6. Cf. Naples v. Moon,
Section 6(1) of Ch. 75-421 does require the property appraiser to ``furnish the commissioners [board of commissioners of the district] a tax roll covering all taxable properties within the district . . . each year.' This ``tax roll' obviously is not the ``assessment roll' to be made by the ``commissioners' referred to in s. 5(3) of Ch. 75-421. Cf. ss.
AS TO QUESTION 2:
Section 6(3) of Ch. 75-421, before its amendment by Ch. 76-402, provided that the property appraiser ``shall receive a commission or fee for assessing such assessments of 3 percent . . . insteadof the same commissions or fees usually provided for theassessment . . . of county taxes.' (Emphasis supplied.) The phrase ``assessing such assessments,' obviously has reference to ``the assessments made by the board' in s. 6(2) of Ch. 75-421 which, by the terms thereof, the property appraiser is required to include in or enter and extend on the county tax roll. Section 6(3) of Ch. 75-421 did not in express terms provide for any commission to the property appraiser for ``furnish(ing) the commissioners a tax roll covering all taxable properties within the district.' The statute not having authorized or required any distinct and separate compensation to the appraiser for such services, the rendition of this particular service is deemed to be gratuitous. Gavagan v. Marshall,
Section 6(3) of Ch. 75-421, was amended by Ch. 76-402, which was an act providing, among other things, for ``changing . . . the method of reimbursement to the Lee County Property Appraiser for assessing taxes.' See title of Ch. 76-402, Section 2 of Ch. 76-402 changed the method of reimbursement to the property appraiser so that it is substantially identical to that provided for by s.
Indeed, this construction is clearly in keeping with long-established principles of law relating to statutory construction. In American Bakeries Company v. Haines City,
It cannot be said that chapter 11975 is artistically drawn. It is in fact materially lacking in the attribute of good draughtsmanship, but this does not render it invalid if there can be gleaned from the whole body of the act a clear, definite legislative intent. In statutory construction the Legislative intent is the polestar by which we must be guided, and this intent must be given effect even though it may appear to contradict the strict letter of the statute and well settled canons of construction. The primary purpose designated should determine the force and effect of the words used in the act, and no literal interpretation should be given that lends to an unreasonable or ridiculous conclusion or a purpose not designed by the lawmakers.
In accord see Ervin v. Peninsula Telephone Company,
Applying these rules of statutory construction to the legislative intent and purpose as previously ascertained and delineated in this opinion and in order to effectuate such evident intent and objective of the Legislature, I am of the opinion that the Lee County Property Appraiser is neither authorized nor required by Ch. 75-421, as modified by Ch. 76-402, to prepare the special assessment roll for the district or to make special assessments. The property appraiser is required by said acts to furnish to the governing board of the district that portion of the county real property assessment roll, or county tax roll, as lists all taxable real property situate within the boundaries of the district. The property appraiser is additionally required to enter and extend the special assessment made by the district's governing board on the county tax roll. The appraiser is compensated for preparing and furnishing to the governing board of the district that part of the county real property assessment roll, or tax roll, as lists all taxable real property situate within the boundaries of the district, and for entering and extending the assessments made by the district's governing board on the county tax roll as prescribed in Ch. 76-402. Such reimbursement to the property appraiser in both procedure and methodology is substantially the same as that found in s.
Prepared by:
Harold F. X. Purnell Assistant Attorney General