Judges: Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
Filed Date: 7/14/1998
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Mr. Douglas K. Tyson Director of Procurement and Contracts Lynx Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority 225 East Robinson Street, Suite 300 Orlando, Florida 32801
Dear Mr. Tyson:
You have asked for my opinion on substantially the following questions:
What is a public employer's responsibility to pay its employees called to active military duty or to military training exercises under Chapter
In sum:
A public employer is required by section
The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority has a number of employees in regular positions who occasionally request military leave to attend obligatory exercises and training lasting less than 30 days. These employees are members of the reserve sections of various branches of the military. You have asked for assistance in applying the statutory provisions of Chapter
Chapter
"(1) All officers or employees of the state, of the . . . counties of the state, and of the municipalities or political subdivisions of the state who are commissioned reserve officers or reserve enlisted personnel in the United States military or naval service or members of the National Guard are entitled to leaves of absence from their respective duties, without loss of vacation leave, pay, time, or efficiency rating, on all days during which they are engaged in training ordered under the provisions of the United States military or naval training regulations for such personnel when assigned to active or inactive duty.
(2) Leaves of absence granted as a matter of legal right under the provisions of this section shall not exceed 17 working days in any one annual period. . . . "
This section specifically authorizes a leave of absence without loss of pay for up to 17 days for military training.
Section
"active duty in the Florida defense force or federal service in training or on active duty with any branch of the Army of the United States, the United States Navy, the Marine Corps of the United States, the Coast Guard of the United States, and service of all officers of the United States Public Health Service detailed by proper authority for duty either with the army or the navy, and shall include the period during which a person in military service is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause."2
Pursuant to the statute, the "period of active military service" begins with the date of entering upon active military service and terminates with death or "a date 30 days immediately next succeeding the date of release or discharge from active military service, or upon return from active military service, whichever shall occur first."3
The protections and privileges described for public officers in section
"All employees of the state, the several counties of the state, and the municipalities or political subdivisions of the state may, in the discretion of the employing authority of such employee, be granted leave of absence under the terms of this law; upon such leave of absence being granted said employee shall enjoy the same rights and privileges as are hereby granted to officials under this law, insofar as may be. Notwithstanding the provisions of s.
The language regarding pay in these statutes is mandatory and does not provide or authorize alternatives.4 A legislative direction as to how a thing is to be done operates as a prohibition against it being done in any other way.5 The discretion allowed a governmental employer in this statute is whether, after the first 30 days with full pay, the employer will supplement the military pay of its personnel and whether it will continue to provide health benefits to those employees.
This office has, in a number of opinions, stated that the language "without loss of pay" in these statutes requires the state and its political subdivisions to pay their officers and employees their full salaries while on military leave, regardless of any other compensation from the military or other source.6 As concluded in Attorney General Opinion 78-81:
"If the municipality were to reduce or offset the compensation paid to its officers or employees on military leave . . . by the amount of their military pay, such officers or employees would suffer a ``loss of pay' which the statute prohibits. The statute is mandatory . . . and allows no discretion or power on the part of a municipality to depart from its operation. . . . [M]unicipalities are prohibited from reducing or offsetting the compensation paid to their officers or employees on authorized military leave . . . in any manner whatsoever."
While the statutes have been amended since that opinion was issued, these amendments have not affected the requirement that government officers and employees on authorized military leave under the terms of these statutes shall suffer no "loss of pay."7
In sum, section
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
RAB/tgh