Judges: Charlie Crist Attorney General
Filed Date: 12/15/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Sharon Outland St. Johns County Property Appraiser County Service Center 4030 Lewis Speedway, Suite 203 So. Augustine, Florida 32084
Dear Ms. Outland:
You have asked substantially the following questions in light of passage of Chapter
1. Does the definition of "common element" include any property in a subdivision plat or site plan intended to benefit lot owners that is not a lot either sold into private ownership or held by the developer as inventory for sale?
2. If a developer retains fee title to property that would otherwise be classified as a common element, must an assessment still be prorated among all lot owners?
3. Is Chapter
4. What is the effect of the transfer of ownership of a common element to a private party?
5. What is the effect of the issuance of a tax certificate on a lot that includes a prorated share of the assessment for the common elements of the subdivision?
6. May lot owners claim ownership of the common elements under a theory of adverse possession?
Section
"(1) Ad valorem taxes and non-ad valorem assessments shall be assessed against the lots within a platted residential subdivision and not upon the subdivision property as a whole. An ad valorem tax or non-ad valorem assessment, including a tax or assessment imposed by a county, municipality, special district, or water management district, may not be assessed separately against common elements utilized exclusively for the benefit of lot owners within the subdivision, regardless of ownership. The value of each parcel of land that is or has been part of a platted subdivision and that is designated on the plat or the approved site plan as a common element for the exclusive benefit of lot owners shall, regardless of ownership, be prorated by the property appraiser and included in the assessment of all the lots within the subdivision which constitute inventory for the developer and are intended to be conveyed or have been conveyed into private ownership for the exclusive benefit of lot owners within the subdivision. (2) As used in this section, the term ``common element' includes: (a) Subdivision property not included within lots constituting inventory for the developer which are intended to be conveyed or have been conveyed into private ownership. (b) An easement through the subdivision property, not including the property described in paragraph (a), which has been dedicated to the public or retained for the benefit of the subdivision. (c) Any other part of the subdivision which has been designated on the plat or is required to be designated on the site plan as a drainage pond, or detention or retention pond, for the exclusive benefit of the subdivision."
Question One
As reflected above, a "common element" is defined in section
Question Two
The statute prohibits the separate assessment of an ad valorem tax or non-ad valorem assessment against common elements utilized exclusively for the benefit of lot owners within the subdivision, "regardless of ownership." Again, the plain language of the statute does not condition application of its provisions on the ownership of the common element. Rather, it is the intended use of the property as evidenced by the site plan or subdivision plat that will control whether assessments against the property are to be prorated among subdivision lot owners. The Florida Department of Revenue has issued a bulletin indicating that the developer is required to show an indication of intent that parcels in which the developer has maintained fee title are common elements or will be common elements.1 The property appraiser must be able to determine that the property is used exclusively for the benefit of lot owners within the subdivision, regardless of whether the fee simple title is held by the developer.
Question Three
The effective date of Chapter
There is nothing in the act that excludes existing subdivisions from the protection it affords. Nor does it appear that the intent of the legislation would be fulfilled if it were applied only to subdivisions platted after the effective date of the act. To give effect to the Legislature's intent,4 and absent any provisions to the contrary, it would appear that Chapter
Question Four
As discussed above, section
The statute makes no provision for the refunding of previously assessed and collected amounts attributable to the prorated assessments on lots owned by private individuals or the developer. Whether subdivision lot owners would have a right of action against the developer is a mixed question of law and fact, dependent upon the sales contracts, subdivision covenants, and any other agreements between the developer and the lot owners. Such determination may not be made by this office.6
Question Five
As noted above, the intent of the act is to protect common element property from being sold due to unpaid taxes by transferring the burden and potential for sale as a result of nonpayment of assessments to lots owned by the developer and individuals. While the nonpayment of taxes or assessments imposed on an individual lot may expose that particular parcel to issuance of a tax certificate, such certificate would not appear to affect the common elements. The purchaser of a tax certificate on an individual lot would receive the same benefit from the common element as could be claimed by the previous lot owner. Thus, the prorating of assessments against common elements does not appear in any way to affect the ownership or fee title of such property, nor does it appear that after the effective date of the act such property would be subject to a tax certificate.7
Question Six
Section
Section
The specific terms of the above sections would have to be met before an individual may be able to claim adverse possession of the common elements of a subdivision. The circumstances under which a parcel of real property is deemed to be "possessed" for both sections
The courts of this state have found that possession necessary to confer title under a claim of adverse possession must be actual, continuous and adverse to the legal title for the full statutorily prescribed period of seven years.11 While in the instant situation legal title may be held by the developer, such property is designated as common elements to the subdivision. Use of the common elements by the lot owners for whose benefit the property has been designated in a manner consistent with its intended purpose would not appear capable of being characterized as adverse possession.12
Sincerely,
Charlie Crist Attorney General