Judges: Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General Prepared by: Patricia R. Gleason Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 10/18/1977
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
QUESTION:
Is a supervisor of elections required to register qualified electors of a municipality, where a charter provision of that municipality stipulates that the city clerk must register such electors?
SUMMARY:
The permanent single registration system established by s. 98.041, F. S., is binding upon all municipalities regardless of size. The terms of s. 98.041 require that all qualified municipal electors be registered in pursuance of this system by the supervisor of elections or the deputy supervisors of elections. The Legislature has preempted the field of voter registration; thus a municipal charter provision requiring that the city clerk register municipal electors has been superseded by general law. The supervisor of elections is not required to establish permanent branch offices or to maintain a set of indexes or records or provide registration services to the electors in municipalities of less than 25,000 persons; qualified electors who are residents of such municipalities may register at the office of the supervisor of elections or at permanent branch offices at which a deputy supervisor is on duty.
Your question is answered in the affirmative.
Your letter indicates that it is your understanding that the charter of the City of Palmetto requires the city clerk to register electors of the city. For purposes of this opinion, I am assuming the existence of such a requirement.
Section 98.041, F. S., provides:
A permanent single registration system for the registration of electors to qualify them to vote in all elections is provided for the several counties and municipalities. This system shall be put into use by all municipalities prior to January 1, 1974, and shall be in lieu of any other system of municipal registration. Electors shall be registered in pursuance of this system by the supervisor or by precinct registration officers. . . . (Emphasis supplied.) [Under former s. 98.271, F. S. 1953, supervisors of elections were authorized to appoint both deputy supervisors of elections and ``as many precinct registration officers for each precinct as may be necessary . . . who shall register electors in the precincts.' This section was amended by s. 19, Ch.
65-134 , Laws of Florida, to delete all reference to the appointment of precinct registration officers. Thus, s. 98.041, F. S., should be read so as to require the registration of electors by the supervisors of elections or by deputy supervisors of elections. The Legislature has recently amended s. 98.041 to reflect this conclusion by striking ``precinct registration officers' and substituting ``a deputy supervisor.' Section 5, Ch.77-175 , Laws of Florida, effective January 1, 1978.]
Section 98.091(3), F. S., in pertinent part provides that any person who is a duly registered elector pursuant to Ch. 98, F. S., ``and who resides within the boundaries of a municipality' is qualified to participate in all municipal elections, the provisions of special acts or local charters notwithstanding. (Section 5 of Ch.
See also s. 98.051, F. S., providing where relevant that ``[a]pplication for voter registration shall be accepted each weekday in the office of supervisor and at all permanent branch offices at which a deputy supervisor is on duty. . . .'
The several statutes cited above insofar as they relate to the permanent single registration system are in pari materia and must be construed together in order to ascertain the legislative intent or purpose so as to harmonize their respective provisions and roles in the legislative scheme. Markham v. Blount,
In Town of Indian River Shores v. Richey,
Similarly, in AGO 073-426, I concluded that, with the adoption of the permanent registration system (Ch.
Accordingly, a municipal charter provision which purports to require the city clerk to register municipal electors has been superseded by the provisions of s. 98.041, F. S., establishing the permanent single registration system and requiring the supervisor of elections or deputy supervisors of elections to register all qualified electors of any municipality.
In reaching the foregoing conclusion, I am not unaware of s. 98.181, F. S., to which you refer in your letter. That section requires the supervisor of elections to keep a set of ``indexes or records' as the supervisor may direct in cities with a population in excess of 25,000 (when any such city is not the county seat) as will enable the supervisor to provide ``all of the services to the electors in such city as are provided by the supervisor at the supervisor's office at the county seat.' Presumably, an office established pursuant to s. 98.181 would be designated by the supervisor as a ``permanent branch office' at which voter registrations must be accepted. See s.
In your letter you note that the population of the City of Palmetto is under 25,000; therefore, you imply that the supervisor is not required, by the terms of s. 98.181, to register electors residing in a municipality with a population of less than 25,000. Such a conclusion is inconsistent with the meaning of the subject statute. Section 98.181 merely requires the supervisor to establish an office and maintain the designated records in certain municipalities and to provide registration services to the electors of any such municipality at such location; s. 98.181 in no way mitigates or otherwise qualifies the duty of the supervisor or of deputy supervisors of elections to register qualified electors of any and all municipalities regardless of the size thereof. Such electors may register at the office of the supervisor of elections or at permanent branch offices designated by such supervisor at which a deputy supervisor of elections is on duty. (See s. 98.271, F. S., as to appointment of deputy supervisors, and s. 5 of Ch.
Prepared by: Patricia R. Gleason Assistant Attorney General