Judges: Jim Smith, Attorney General Prepared by: Joslyn Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 3/13/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Kenneth E. Easley Belleair Bluffs City Attorney Clearwater
QUESTION:
Is ``medical information' gathered and included in a rescue report by an emergency medical team from the municipal fire department confidential and thereby excluded as a public record under ch. 119, F. S.?
SUMMARY:
In the absence of any statutory provision exempting the particular records in question, and information contained therein, from the personal inspection and examination requirements of ch. 119, F. S., and until judicially or legislatively determined to the contrary, the rescue reports containing ``medical information' or ``patient history' made by an emergency medical technician in performing his duties as a member of the fire department and received and kept by the municipal fire department of the City of Belleair Bluffs are public records and are subject to inspection, examination, and copying by any person desiring to do so as prescribed in ss.
According to your letter and the rescue report form of the Belleair Bluffs Fire Department attached thereto, the City of Belleair Bluffs maintains an emergency vehicle equipped to provide emergency medical services to the community. The vehicle is manned by an emergency medical technician who is a member of the fire department. When providing such emergency medical services, the technician gathers certain information, including ``medical information' and ``patient history,' which apparently is required by the city fire department in making the rescue report and which is kept by and in the custodianship of the fire department. In a subsequent conversation with our office, you stated that the fire department is a municipal fire department funded by municipal funds and that the emergency medical technician performs these emergency medical services as a member of the fire department. You indicate in your letter that parties other than the person receiving the emergency medical or fire rescue services in question have requested copies of the rescue report, and you therefore inquire as to whether the fire department's rescue report, and the ``medical information' contained therein, is a public record within the purview of ch. 119, F. S., subject to inspection and examination by any person desiring to do so as prescribed by s.
Florida's Public Records Law, ch. 119, F. S., makes all state, county, and municipal records open to personal inspection by any person. Section
[W]e hold that a public record, for purposes of section
119.011 (1), is any material prepared in connection with official agency business which is intended to perpetuate, communicate, or formalize knowledge of some type. . . . Inter-office memoranda and intra-office memoranda communicating information from one public employee to another or merely prepared for filing, even though not a part of an agency's later formal public product, would nonetheless constitute public records inasmuch as they supply the final evidence of knowledge obtained in connection with the transaction of official business.
Cf. Schwartzman v. Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department,supra, in which the court, having concluded that the fire department was an ``agency' under s.
The rescue report in question, with ``medical information' contained therein, is made by a city fireman, a member of the city fire department, in the performance of his duties to provide the emergency medical or fire rescue services in question; the report is received and kept by the municipal fire department as part of its records and in connection with the official business of the fire department. It thus appears that such rescue reports and the ``medical information' facially appearing thereon would be a public record within the purview of s.
My examination of the general laws (no applicable special law having been brought to my attention) fails to reveal any provision which would exempt these fire department rescue reports from public inspection and examination. Part III of ch. 401, F. S., which generally regulates emergency medical transportation services and advanced life support or fire rescue services, contains no such exemption for records made or received by municipal fire departments or by any emergency medical technician, paramedic, or fire rescue service personnel. Section 455.241, F. S., provides that the reports of any health care practitioner licensed pursuant to ch. 458 (medical practice), ch. 459 (osteopathy), ch. 460 (chiropractic), ch. 461 (podiatry), ch. 462 (naturopathy), ch. 463 (optometry), ch. 464 (nursing), ch. 466 (dentistry), or ch. 474 (veterinary medicine), regarding the physical or mental examination of or the administration of treatment to any person, ``shall not be furnished to any person other than the patient or his legal representative, except upon written authorization of the patient . . . .' The medical information collected by the emergency medical technician/fireman and facially appearing on the fire department's rescue report, however, does not fall within this limited exception. Chapter 458 does not make any provision for the exemption of any ``medical information,' ``patient history,' or treatment information or data from the Public Records Law. In fact, s.
You inquire as to whether these records may be exempt under a state constitutional right of privacy. The Florida Supreme Court recently considered whether such a right existed under the State Constitution which would exempt certain types of records from public disclosure. In Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Schaffer, Reid and Associates, Inc.,
Prepared by: Joslyn Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co. , 372 So. 2d 420 ( 1979 )
Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Associates, Inc. , 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4104 ( 1980 )
News-Press Publishing Co. v. Wisher , 345 So. 2d 646 ( 1977 )
Schwartzman v. Merritt Island Vol. Fire Dept. , 352 So. 2d 1230 ( 1977 )
State Ex Rel. Cummer v. Pace , 118 Fla. 496 ( 1935 )
City of Gainesville v. STATE IAFF , 298 So. 2d 478 ( 1974 )
State Ex Rel. Veale v. City of Boca Raton , 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16909 ( 1977 )