Judges: Bill McCollum, Attorney General
Filed Date: 2/16/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Reischmann:
As City Attorney for the City of Palm Coast, you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following questions:
1. Whether the provisions relating to the exempt and confidential nature of social security numbers held by a public agency in subparagraphs 119.071(5)(a)6. and (5)(a)7., Florida Statutes, are in conflict?
2. Whether the City of Palm Coast may deny a request for social security numbers from a commercial entity pursuant to section
In sum:
1. There is no conflict between subparagraphs 119.071(5)(a)6., and (5)(a)7., Florida Statutes, and these provisions should be read together and harmonized.
2. The question of whether providing "single query data searches of its database to its customers who are banks, finance companies, licensed repossession companies and licensed private investigative agencies" comes within the scope of a "commercial activity" for purposes of section
Question One
Section
Section
"6. Social security numbers held by an agency may be disclosed if any of the following apply:
a. The disclosure of the social security number is expressly required by federal or state law or a court order.
b. The disclosure of the social security number is necessary for the receiving agency or governmental entity to perform its duties and responsibilities.
c. The individual expressly consents in writing to the disclosure of his or her social security number.
d. The disclosure of the social security number is made to comply with the USA Patriot Act of 2001, Pub.L. No.
107-56 , or Presidential Executive Order 13224.e. The disclosure of the social security number is made to a commercial entity for the permissible uses set forth in the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994,
18 U.S.C. ss. 2721 et seq.; the Fair Credit Reporting Act,15 U.S.C. ss. 1681 et seq.; or the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999,15 U.S.C. ss. 6801 et seq., provided that the authorized commercial entity complies with the requirements of this paragraph.f. The disclosure of the social security number is for the purpose of the administration of health benefits for an agency employee or his or her dependents.
g. The disclosure of the social security number is for the purpose of the administration of a pension fund administered for the agency employee's retirement fund, deferred compensation plan, or defined contribution plan.
h. The disclosure of the social security number is for the purpose of the administration of the Uniform Commercial Code by the office of the Secretary of State."
Staff analysis of the bill indicates that this language was intended to amend the general public records exemption for social security numbers held by an agency as provided in section
Subparagraph 7.b. states that a governmental agency may not deny a "commercial entity" that is engaged in the performance of a "commercial activity" access to social security numbers, so long as those social security numbers will only be used in the performance of a commercial activity and on condition that the commercial entity requests the numbers in writing.4 For purposes of the subparagraph, a "[c]ommercial activity" is defined to mean:
". . . permissible uses set forth in the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994,
The term "commercial entity" is also defined for purposes of the statute and includes "any corporation, partnership, limited partnership, proprietorship, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, or association that performs a commercial activity in this state."6
The statute requires that prior to releasing social security numbers to a commercial entity pursuant to subparagraph 7.b., Florida Statutes, the agency must receive a written request that satisfies several statutory conditions:
"(I) It must be verified as provided in s.
92.525 ;(II) It must be legibly signed by an authorized officer, employee, or agent of the commercial entity;
(III) The written request must contain the commercial entity's name, business mailing and location addresses, and business telephone number; and
(IV) It must contain a statement of the specific purposes for which it needs the social security numbers and how the social security numbers will be used in the performance of a commercial activity, including the identification of any specific federal or state law that permits such use."7
The statute also authorizes an agency to "request any other information reasonably necessary to verify the identity of a commercial entity requesting the social security numbers and the specific purposes for which the numbers will be used."8 Any person who makes a false representation in an attempt to obtain a social security number pursuant to subparagraph 7.a., Florida Statutes, or any person who "willfully and knowingly violates" the paragraph commits a third degree felony. Public officers violating this paragraph commit a noncriminal infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $500.00 per violation.9
Both subparagraphs 119.071(5)(a)6. and 7., Florida Statutes, deal with the disclosure of social security numbers to commercial entities and overlap with regard to those federal provisions under which release of these numbers is authorized. Recognizing the intent of the Legislature, 10 the two provisions may be read together to accomplish the legislative goal of providing an "exception to the exemption."11 The language of subparagraph 6. is permissive and authorizes (but does not mandate) disclosure under these specific circumstances. The language of subparagraph 6. does not foreclose the existence of other exceptions. The language of subparagraph 7.b., Florida Statutes, constitutes a recognition by the Legislature of the permissive nature of subparagraph 6. and qualifies the discretion of an agency to release social security numbers to commercial entities by prohibiting an agency from refusing to disclose this information if the commercial entity requestor qualifies under the statute and provides a written request for the information.12
In sum, it is my opinion that section
Question Two
Your second question requires resolution of a mixed question of law and fact which is beyond the authority of this office.13
As discussed in my response to your first question, section
The question of whether providing "single query data searches of its database to its customers who are banks, finance companies, licensed repossession companies and licensed private investigative agencies" comes within the scope of a "commercial activity" for purposes of subsection (5), Florida Statutes, cannot be resolved by this office. The City of Palm Coast is authorized to request additional information reasonably necessary to determine "the specific purposes for which the [social security] numbers will be used"14 if sufficient information upon which to base its release of this information has not been provided.
Sincerely,
Bill McCollum Attorney General
BM/tgh
Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion , 604 So. 2d 452 ( 1992 )
Barruzza v. Suddath Van Lines, Inc. , 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1952 ( 1985 )
Garner v. Ward , 251 So. 2d 252 ( 1971 )
Wakulla County v. Davis , 395 So. 2d 540 ( 1981 )
P. Crosby Assoc. v. ST. BD. OF IND. COLL. , 506 So. 2d 490 ( 1987 )
Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain Lands , 154 Fla. 554 ( 1944 )