Judges: Bill McCollum, Attorney General
Filed Date: 11/5/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Ms. Boutsis:
On behalf of the Village of Palmetto Bay, you ask substantially the following question:
Does section
In sum:
Section
Section
This office commented on the requirements of the 2009 act in Attorney General Opinion 2009-54, as they relate to building permits issued by local governments. It was concluded that those seeking to avail themselves of the benefits of the extension of their locally-issued building permits would be required to provide written notification to the local governmental entity which issued the permits by the deadline prescribed in the act, December 31, 2009. The language of the act clearly applied to building permits issued by local governments.1
During the 2010 legislative session, section
"(a) A permit or other authorization under any programmatic or regional general permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers. (b) A permit or other authorization held by an owner or operator determined to be in significant noncompliance with the conditions of the permit or authorization as established through the issuance of a warning letter or notice of violation, the initiation of formal enforcement, or other equivalent action by the authorizing agency. (c) A permit or other authorization, if granted an extension that would delay or prevent compliance with a court order."
It is a well-established rule of statutory construction that where the Legislature has enumerated things upon which a statute is to operate, no others may be inferred.4 Thus, it would appear that only those permits enumerated in section 46(4), Chapter
There is nothing in the language of the 2010 amendment of section
You also question the interplay between the provisions of section
Accordingly, it is my opinion that the 2010 amendment to section
Sincerely,
Bill McCollum Attorney General
BM/tals
"(1) Except as provided in subsection (4), and in recognition of 2009 real estate market conditions, any permit issued by the Department of Environmental Protection or a water management district pursuant to part IV of chapter
373 , Florida Statutes, that has an expiration date of September 1, 2008, through January 1, 2012, is extended and renewed for a period of 2 years following its date of expiration. This extension includes any local government-issued development order or building permit. The 2-year extension also applies to build out dates including any build out date extension previously granted under s.380.06 (19)(c), Florida Statutes. This section shall not be construed to prohibit conversion from the construction phase to the operation phase upon completion of construction." (e.s.)
"105.4.1 Permit intent.
A permit issued shall be construed to be a license to proceed with the work and not as authority to violate, cancel, alter or set aside any of the provisions of the technical codes, nor shall issuance of a permit prevent the building official from thereafter requiring a correction of errors in plans, construction or violations of this code. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within six months after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of six months after the time the work is commenced."
Thayer v. State , 335 So. 2d 815 ( 1976 )
Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Authority , 461 So. 2d 72 ( 1984 )
Florida Ass'n of Counties, Inc. v. DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF ... , 595 So. 2d 42 ( 1992 )
Florida Ass'n of Counties, Inc. v. DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF ... , 580 So. 2d 641 ( 1991 )
McKendry v. State , 641 So. 2d 45 ( 1994 )
Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain Lands , 154 Fla. 554 ( 1944 )