Judges: Charlie Crist Attorney General
Filed Date: 4/5/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Ms. Sonja Knighton City Attorney for Miami Gardens 501 Northeast 8th Street Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304
Dear Ms. Knighton:
As the City Attorney for the City of Miami Gardens, you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question:
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
This office recently issued Attorney General Opinion 2004-59 to the City of Miami Gardens. That opinion discussed the provisions of Chapter
Chapter
"[i]t is in the public interest that any independent special district created pursuant to state law not outlive its usefulness and that the operation of such a district and the exercise by the district of its powers be consistent with applicable due process, disclosure, accountability, ethics, and government-in-the-sunshine requirements which apply both to governmental entities and to their elected and appointed officials."2
As expressed in this section, the Legislature found that "special districts operate to serve a public purpose and that this is best secured by certain minimum standards of accountability designed to inform the public and appropriate general-purpose local governments of the status and activities of special districts."3 Further, "[i]t is the intent of the Legislature that this public trust be secured by requiring each independent special district in the state to register and report its financial and other activities."4 The statute recognizes that special districts are created to serve specific purposes and that special districts should cooperate and coordinate their activities with units of general-purpose local government.5
For purposes of the act a "special district" is defined in section
"a local unit of special purpose, as opposed to general-purpose, government within a limited boundary, created by general law, special act, local ordinance, or by rule of the Governor and Cabinet. The special purpose or purposes of special districts are implemented by specialized functions and related prescribed powers. . . . The term does not include a school district, a community college district, a special improvement district created pursuant to s.
A community development district operating pursuant to Chapter
Section
"The Legislature finds it to be in the public interest to establish an oversight review process for special districts wherein each special district in the state may be reviewed by the local general-purpose government in which the district exists. The Legislature further finds and determines that such law fulfills an important state interest. It is the intent of the Legislature that the oversight review process shall contribute to informed decisionmaking. These decisions may involve the continuing existence or dissolution of a district, the appropriate future role and focus of a district, improvements in the functioning or delivery of services by a district, and the need for any transition, adjustment, or special implementation periods or provisions. Any final recommendations from the oversight review process that are adopted and implemented by the appropriate level of government shall not be implemented in a manner that would impair the obligation of contracts."
The statute requires that any oversight review process take place in conjunction with special district public facilities reporting and the process for the local government evaluation and appraisal report contained in section
Section
"(a) the degree to which the service or services offered by the special district are essential or contribute to the well-being of the community.
(b) The extent of continuing need for the service or services currently provided by the special district.
(c) The extent of municipal annexation or incorporation activity occurring or likely to occur within the boundaries of the special district and its impact on the delivery of services by the special district.
(d) Whether there is a less costly alternative method of delivering the
service or services that would adequately provide the district residents with the services provided by the district.
(e) Whether transfer of the responsibility for delivery of the service or services to an entity other than the special district being reviewed could be accomplished without jeopardizing the district's existing contracts, bonds, or outstanding indebtedness.
(f) Whether the Auditor General has notified the Legislative Auditing Committee that the special district's audit report, reviewed pursuant to s.
(g) Whether the district is inactive according to the official list of special districts, and whether the district is meeting and discharging its responsibilities as required by its charter, as well as projected increases or decreases in district activity.
(h) Whether the special district has failed to comply with any of the reporting requirements in this chapter, including preparation of the public facilities report.
(i) Whether the special district has designated a registered office and agent as required by s.
The final report of a reviewing government must be filed with the government that created the district.11
In addition to the oversight review process established by section
Therefore it is my opinion that various provisions of Chapter
Sincerely,
Charlie Crist Attorney General
CC/tgh
"a local unit of special-purpose government which is created pursuant to this act and limited to the performance of those specialized functions authorized by this act; the boundaries of which are contained wholly within a single county; the governing head of which is a body created, organized, and constituted and authorized to function specifically as prescribed in this act for the delivery of urban community development services; and the formation, powers, governing body, operation, duration, accountability, requirements for disclosure, and termination of which are as required by general law."