Judges: Charlie Crist Attorney General
Filed Date: 3/24/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Mr. Allan E. Keen Chairman Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority 525 South Magnolia Avenue Orlando, Florida 32801-4414
Dear Mr. Keen:
You ask the following question:
Are audio tape recordings of staff meetings made by a secretary for use in preparing minutes of the meeting public records subject to Florida's Public Records Law, Chapter
The Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority (authority) is an agency of the state1 with the authority to acquire, hold, construct, improve, maintain, operate, own and lease the expressway system described in Part V, Chapter
You state that these meetings fall outside the Government in the Sunshine Law, section
Florida's Public Records Law requires that all records made or received in connection with the transaction of official business by any public body, officer, or employee of such, be open for public inspection and copying, unless there is a statutorily created exemption making such records confidential or exempt from disclosure.3
Section
"all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of officialbusiness by any agency." (e.s.)
The staff meetings you have described are part of the day-to-day official business of the authority and any public record made or received in connection with such meetings would be subject to inspection and copying. Clearly, section
In Attorney General Opinion 86-93, this office was asked to address a similar situation involving sound tape recordings of a school board meeting when a written version of the proceedings was made available to the public. In that case, the secretary for the school board used a tape recorder to assist in the production of typed minutes of the board's meetings. The opinion recognized a statutory requirement that minutes of the meeting of a board or commission subject to section
The Supreme Court of Florida in Shevin v. Byron, Harless,Schaffer, Reid Associates, Inc.,5 contrasted public records with materials prepared as drafts or notes, which it characterized as "precursors" of governmental records not intended to be final evidence of the knowledge recorded. The Court found that items that would not be considered public records are "rough drafts, notes to be used in preparing some other documentary material, and tapes or notes taken by a secretary as dictation."6
The audio tape recordings considered here, however, are made at the request of the executive director as an independent record of the proceedings and, unlike tapes or notes taken by a secretary as dictation, are intended to perpetuate the discussion at a staff meeting. Moreover, this office's position in Attorney General Opinion 86-93 has not changed, nor has it been addressed or altered either judicially or legislatively.
Accordingly, it is my opinion that audio tape recordings of staff meetings made at the request of the executive director by a secretary for use in preparing minutes of the meeting are public records subject to Florida's Public Records Law, Chapter
Sincerely,
Charlie Crist Attorney General
CC/tls