Judges: Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General Prepared by: Donald K. Rudser, Assistant Attorney General
Filed Date: 4/9/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
QUESTION:
Does the adoption of s.
SUMMARY:
Under the authority of s.
As you noted in your recent letter, s. 404.08, F.S., was repealed by s. 33, Ch. 73-331, Laws of Florida. However, s. 404.08, F.S., has been, in substance, set forth in s.
As you are aware, Forbes v. Board of Health,
Likewise, it must be pointed out that Art. 10, s. 9, State Const., states: "Repeal or amendment of a criminal statute shall not affect prosecution or punishment for any crime previously committed."
Also, I would note that s. 775.12, F.S., reads:
"No offense committed, and no penalty and forfeiture incurred, prior to the taking effect of these statutes, shall be affected thereby, and no prosecution had or commenced, shall be abated thereby, except that when any punishment, forfeiture or penalty shall have been mitigated by the provisions of these statutes, such provisions shall apply to and control any judgment or sentence to be pronounced, and all prosecutions shall be conducted according to the provisions of law in force at the time of such further prosecution and trial applicable to the case."
While the procedure contemplated by s.
Likewise, I would point out that s.
Clearly, it has been the intent of the legislature through all the above authority not to void actions by amendment or reenactment of any law.
Inasmuch as Ch. 73-331, supra, merely amends and renumbers ss. 404.08 and 404.09, F.S., you clearly have the power under the authority cited above to commence forfeiture proceedings under s.