Judges: Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
Filed Date: 12/15/1994
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Mr. Roger Carlton City Manager of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Dear Mr. Carlton:
On behalf of the City of Miami Beach, you ask substantially the following question:
May a municipality require that proposed landscape plans, exclusive of those for single family residences, be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect?
In sum:
A municipality may require that proposed landscape plans be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect only to the extent that such a requirement does not conflict with state law authorizing architects and engineers to perform services that may fall within the scope of those provided by landscape architects.
You state that the City of Miami Beach is contemplating revising its landscape code provisions to require that proposed landscape plans, excluding those for single family residences, be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect. The question has been raised, however, whether architects or engineers are authorized by state law to provide landscape architectural services incidental to performing their professional services, and, therefore, may not be precluded by a local ordinance from rendering such services under the above-described circumstances.
Municipalities have been granted broad home rule powers to exercise any power for municipal purposes except when expressly prohibited by law.1 Moreover, by enactment of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,2 the Legislature has provided the "necessary statutory direction and basis for municipal and county officials to carry out their comprehensive planning and land development regulation powers, duties, and responsibilities." This office has stated that a municipality may exercise its home rule powers for zoning, subdivision, and planning regulations, provided such regulations are consistent with the requirements of the planning and land development act.3
It is well settled that municipal ordinances are inferior to state statutes and, as such, they may not prohibit that which is allowed nor allow that which is prohibited by state law.4 Accordingly, absent an express constitutional or statutory prohibition, a municipality may exercise its home rule powers to require that proposed landscape plans be signed and sealed by a landscape architect to the extent such a requirement does not conflict with state law.
In section
to assure competent landscape planning and design of public and private environments, prevention of contamination of water supplies, barrier-free public and private spaces, conservation of natural resources through proper land and water management practices, prevention of erosion, energy conservation, functional and aesthetically pleasing environmental contributions to man's psychological and sociological well-being, and an enhancement of the quality of life in a safe and healthy environment and to assure the highest possible quality of the practice of landscape architecture in this state.
The term "landscape architecture" is defined to be "professional services," including but not limited to, the following:
(a) Consultation, investigation, research, planning, design, preparation of drawings, specifications, contract documents and reports, responsible construction supervision, or landscape management in connection with the planning and development of land and incidental water areas, including the use of Xeriscape as defined in s.
Thus, any person engaging in any of the above-cited activities must be licensed as provided in Part II, Chapter
This exception would protect a general contractor who is providing landscape architecture services as a component of a design-build project from charges of unlicensed practice of landscape architecture under the provisions of Part II, Chapter
Nothing in this part shall be construed to repeal, amend, limit, or otherwise affect any specific provision of any local building code or zoning law or ordinance that has been duly adopted, now or hereafter enacted, which is more restrictive, with respect to the services of registered architects or registered interior designers, than the provisions of this part. (e.s.)7
Section
This office in Attorney General Opinion 73-263 (interpreting the predecessor statutes to section
A municipal code requiring that proposed landscape plans, exclusive of those for single family residential projects, be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect would not appear to conflict with the statutory licensing provisions governing landscape architecture. To the extent such a require-ment precludes architects or engineers from providing services they are statutorily authorized to perform, however, the code would be unenforceable as in conflict with state law.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
RAB/tls
The Legislature recognizes that pursuant to the grant of power set forth in s. 2(b), Art. VIII of the State Constitution, the legislative body of each municipality has the power to enact legislation concerning any subject matter upon which the state Legislature may act, except: (a) The subjects of annexation, merger, and exercise of extraterritorial power, which require general or special law pursuant to s. 2(c), Art. VIII of the State Constitution; (b) Any subject expressly prohibited by the constitution; (c) Any subject expressly preempted to state or county government by the constitution or by general law; and (d) Any subject preempted to a county pursuant to a county charter adopted under the authority of ss. 1(g), 3, and 6(e), Art. VIII of the State Constitution.
Nothing contained in ss.