Judges: Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
Filed Date: 12/13/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Mr. Steven A. Schultz Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board Attorney Bank of America Tower 100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131-2144
Dear Mr. Schultz:
As attorney for the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board, you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question:
Is it necessary for a taxpayer to file an application for an exemption with the property appraiser in order to vest the value adjustment board with jurisdiction to accept and consider a petition filed after the statutory deadline established under section
In sum:
Section
According to your letter, on October 16, 2001, a taxpayer attempted to file with the property appraiser a late application for a homestead exemption for the year 2001. The property appraiser refused to accept the filing of the application after the statutory deadline. As a result, the taxpayer sought to bypass the filing of the application with the property appraiser and went directly to the value adjustment board with a request that the value adjustment board act under the provisions of section
The Dade County Value Adjustment Board is a quasi-judicial governmental body created pursuant to section
Chapter
"Every person or organization who, on January 1, has the legal title to real or personal property, except inventory, which is entitled by law to exemption from taxation as a result of its ownership and use shall, on or before March 1 of each year, file an application for exemption with the county property appraiser, listing and describing the property for which exemption is claimed and certifying its ownership and use. . . . Failure to make application, when required, on or before March 1 of any year shall constitute a waiver of the exemption privilege for that year, except as provided in subsection (7) or subsection (8)."
Subsection (7) provides that the value adjustment board must grant any exemption for an otherwise eligible applicant if the applicant can prove that his or her failure to apply by the deadline of March 1 was the result of a postal error.
It is the general rule that exemptions from taxation must be created by clear and definite terms; they cannot rest on implication and they will not be enlarged by construction.2 Further, exemptions from taxation, whether stated in the Constitution or in the statutes, are to be construed against the claimant and in favor of the taxing power in cases of doubt in order to confine the exemptions within the limitations prescribed by the sovereign power.3
Section
"Any applicant who is qualified to receive any exemption under subsection (1) and who fails to file an application by March 1, may file an application for the exemption and may file, pursuant to s.
The Attorney General's Office has previously determined that this statutory section is applicable to applications for homestead exemptions.4
The statute provides a specific procedure for anyone who is qualified to receive an exemption from taxation for real or personal property based on ownership but who fails to meet the March 1 filing deadline. However, to take advantage of this exception, the statutory directives must be met, that is, the time frame established by the statute must be satisfied and a fee of $15 must be paid. A legislative direction as to how something must be accomplished serves as a prohibition against it being done in any other way.5
Further, section
"Any applicant who is qualified to receive any exemption under subsection (1) and who fails to file an application by March 1, may file an application for the exemption and may file, pursuant to s.
The word "and" is ordinarily used as a conjunction meaning "along with or together with."6
This office has previously determined that value adjustment boards may only consider applications for exemptions previously submitted to the property appraiser in a timely manner.7 As Attorney General's Opinion 70-83 stated, the statutes "clearly express an intent that applications for exemption are to be reviewed by the board of tax adjustment (now the value adjustment board) . . . only when such review is initiated or invoked by dispute or appeal." Thus, value adjustment boards do not present the appropriate forum for consideration of original applications for tax exemptions.
Therefore, it is my opinion that section
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
RAB/tzg